Vulnerability and Experiences Related to Social Victimization Among Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Fisher, Marisa H.; Moskowitz, Andrew L.; Hodapp, Robert M.

doi:10.1080/19315864.2011.592239

Cited by 46 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The original SVQ contained 45 items, from which 30 items loaded onto six factors (see Fisher et al, 2012 for description of factor analytic procedures). The 30 items within these 6 factors were used for this study.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Once they reach school age, youth with ID are more likely to experience bullying and peer victimization than their typically developing peers (Cappadocia, Weiss, & Pepler, 2012; Sentenac, Gavin, Arnaud, Molcho, Godeau, & Gabhainn, 2012; Sterzing, Shattuck, Narendorf, Wagner, & Cooper, 2012). Finally, adults with ID (versus those without) are at increased risk of experiencing physical and sexual assault, robbery, and personal theft (Fisher, Moskowitz, & Hodapp, 2012; Wilson & Brewer, 1992). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To explore this relationship, Fisher et al (2012) recently developed the Social Vulnerability Questionnaire. They found that social vulnerability could be separated into four distinct areas—risk awareness, social protection, perceived vulnerability, and parental independence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Differences in social vulnerability among individuals with autism spectrum disorder, Williams syndrome, and Down syndrome

Fisher¹,

Moskowitz²,

Hodapp³

2013

Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although individuals with disabilities are at increased risk of victimization, few studies examine persons with different disability conditions to determine whether distinctive cognitive-behavioral profiles are associated with different levels of social vulnerability. To determine the differences in social vulnerability and experiences of victimization, caregiver responses to a Social Vulnerability Questionnaire were examined for 103 caregivers of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Williams syndrome (WS), and Down syndrome (DS). Although all three groups experienced similar rates and types of victimization, the specific correlates of social vulnerability differed by disability. Individuals with ASD displayed less risk awareness and had less social protection; those with WS were rated higher on risk factors related to perceived vulnerability and parental independence; and those with DS had less risk awareness and were perceived to be more vulnerable. Safety interventions should be tailored to address each group's specific correlates of social vulnerability.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Differences in social vulnerability among individuals with autism spectrum disorder, Williams syndrome, and Down syndrome

Fisher¹,

Moskowitz²,

Hodapp³

2013

Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These are described in the review (the Social Vulnerability Questionnaire, Fisher, Moskowitz, & Hodapp, 2012; the Test of Interpersonal Competence and Personal Vulnerability, Wilson, Seaman, & Nettelbeck, 1996; and the Decision-making Video Scale, Hickson, Khemka, Golden, & Chatzistyli, 2008). Moreover, data collected by the US Bureau of Justice indicate that between 2010 and 2013 rates of crime against people with a disability, including an intellectual one, continued to increase (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2015).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Encouragingly, the significance of the problem has been increasingly recognised, with new assessment techniques for identifying vulnerability emerging after our paper was published. These are described in the review (the Social Vulnerability Questionnaire, Fisher, Moskowitz, & Hodapp, 2012; the Test of Interpersonal Competence and Personal Vulnerability, Wilson, Seaman, & Nettelbeck, 1996; and the Decision-making Video Scale, Hickson, Khemka, Golden, & Chatzistyli, 2008). The focus on detecting and addressing vulnerability to criminal victimisation is encouraging because it provides a mechanism for impacting crime rates.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Victimisation and Social Vulnerability of Adults with Intellectual Disability: Revisiting Wilson and Brewer (1992) and Responding to Updated Research

Wilson

2016

Australian Psychologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the late 1980s police were concerned about the potential impacts of moves to close institutions housing people with mental health problems and intellectual disability. This concern resulted in a project designed to measure incidence of criminal victimisation among the latter group: face-to-face interviews were undertaken with 174 sheltered workshop attendees. This study highlighted the significantly heightened risk of the group for both personal and property crime and we undertook subsequent work in an attempt to identify variables that impacted upon vulnerability. The review of research extending beyond Wilson and Brewer indicated that the results were not isolated to this initial study. The paper reflects on the review to discuss research and other the activities in this area that have followed subsequently. Although advances have been made in the collection of data, and both criminal justice and social services have been encouraged to take note of this group's vulnerability, the challenge of decreasing criminal victimisation clearly remains. The nature and complexity of this challenge is described.

show abstract

Behavioural and Cognitive Phenotypes in Genetic Disorders Associated with Offending

Rice

Einfeld

Howlin

2019

The Wiley Handbook on What Works for Offenders With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vulnerability and Experiences Related to Social Victimization Among Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Cited by 46 publications

References 18 publications

Differences in social vulnerability among individuals with autism spectrum disorder, Williams syndrome, and Down syndrome

Differences in social vulnerability among individuals with autism spectrum disorder, Williams syndrome, and Down syndrome

Victimisation and Social Vulnerability of Adults with Intellectual Disability: Revisiting Wilson and Brewer (1992) and Responding to Updated Research

Behavioural and Cognitive Phenotypes in Genetic Disorders Associated with Offending

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About