Vulnerability as a Function of Individual and Group Resources in Cumulative Risk Assessment

Abstract

BackgroundThe field of risk assessment has focused on protecting the health of individual people or populations of wildlife from single risks, mostly from chemical exposure. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently began to address multiple risks to communities in the “Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment” [EPA/630/P02/001F. Washington DC:Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2003)].Simultaneously, several reports concluded that some individuals and groups are more vulnerable to environmental risks than the general population. However, vulnerability has received little specific attention in the risk assessment literature.ObjectiveOur objective is to examine the issue of vulnerability in cumulative risk assessment and present a conceptual framework rather than a comprehensive review of the literature. In this article we consider similarities between ecologic and human communities and the factors that make communities vulnerable to environmental risks.DiscussionThe literature provides substantial evidence on single environmental factors and simple conditions that increase vulnerability or reduce resilience for humans and ecologic systems. This observation is especially true for individual people and populations of wildlife. Little research directly addresses the topic of vulnerability in cumulative risk situations, especially at the community level. The community level of organization has not been adequately considered as an end point in either human or ecologic risk assessment. Furthermore, current information on human risk does not completely explain the level of response in cumulative risk conditions. Ecologic risk situations are similarly more complex and unpredictable for cases of cumulative risk.ConclusionsPsychosocial conditions and responses are the principal missing element for humans. We propose a model for including psychologic and social factors as an integral component of cumulative risk assessment.

The Drinking Water Disparities Framework: On the Origins and Persistence of Inequities in Exposure

“…These frameworks discuss how race, class, social factors, 26,27 and multiple levels of decision-making 22 can have an impact on exposure pathways. 28 Sexton et al 26 expanded the traditional exposure---disease paradigm 29 28 In sum, social epidemiology frameworks emphasize how and why health disparities may arise, and, to some extent, why they persist. They do not, however, focus specifically on drinking water.…”

Identifying Vulnerable Populations through an Examination of the Association Between Multipollutant Profiles and Poverty

“…11,12 As a result, environmental justice advocates have urged regulators to develop scientifically valid indicators from a multipollutant approach to examine environmental health inequities and guide decision making. 13,14 Developing such measures is complicated due to issues of comparison and high levels of correlation among some pollutants. For example, the highly intercorrelated nature of air pollutants makes it difficult to examine their combined effects on health-related outcomes and measures of deprivation.…”

Índice de vulnerabilidad al VIH en población habitante de calle

“…El modelo de poblaciones vulnerables ampliado, incorpora tradicionales factores descritos en el modelo de Andersen (34,35) y también incluyen vulnerabilidades específicas comunes entre las personas sin hogar, tales como el abuso de sustancias, enfermedad mental, y las barreras para la atención de salud; estos tres componentes son similares a los observados en el análisis exploratorio realizado en el que los tres factores determinantes fueron el abuso de sustancias, la percepción de enfermedad, incluyendo la enfermedad mental y como otro factor el apoyo social y familiar descrito por otros autores en el marco de la vulnerabilidad al VIH (11,36,37) . La vulnerabilidad de una población con el VIH/Sida tiene sus raíces en los procesos sociales y las causas subyacentes que pueden realmente estar muy relacionadas con el resultado final en sí, es decir, la transmisión del VIH.…”