2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2020.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability assessment of fault-tolerant optical network-on-chips

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although both of the designs in [23,29] increase the number of MRs for reliability purposes, they cause extra contention and insertion loss, since they use more resources (e.g., MRs) to reroute faulty signals in many cases. Similarly, the authors in [30] proposed a framework to construct fault-tolerant optical routers by using redundant MRs to provide extra paths. However, this framework is applied manually and does not have a regular rule to fit all types of optical routers, as well as provide more blocking as the previous two proposed ORs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although both of the designs in [23,29] increase the number of MRs for reliability purposes, they cause extra contention and insertion loss, since they use more resources (e.g., MRs) to reroute faulty signals in many cases. Similarly, the authors in [30] proposed a framework to construct fault-tolerant optical routers by using redundant MRs to provide extra paths. However, this framework is applied manually and does not have a regular rule to fit all types of optical routers, as well as provide more blocking as the previous two proposed ORs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the performance of our architecture, we implement the reliable ring waveguide into several nonreliable optical routers proposed in [31,[33][34][35][36][37][38]; two of them are presented in Figure 5, and we compare them with 7 × 7 and 5 × 5 FTTDOR proposed in [29] and the NRFT optical router in [23] and some other fault-tolerant optical routers presented in [30]. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Table 2 compares the features of the proposed faulttolerant scheme compared with some previously proposed fault-tolerant optical routers for different sizes.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Suffering from high power cost, long network latency, and low network throughput [2,6,7], the overall performance of existing NoC systems is undesirable. Many approaches have been proposed to improve NoC performance, which includes changing the NoC structure [7,8], dynamically changing packet injection rate [9,10], optimizing routing algorithms [5,11], and so on. Routing algorithm optimization is one of a lower cost solution [12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%