11Logistic regression studies which assess landslide susceptibility are widely available in the literature. 12However, a global review of these studies to synthesise and compare the results does not exist. There 13 are currently no guidelines for selection of covariates to be used in logistic regression analysis and as 14 such, the covariates selected vary widely between studies. An inventory of significant covariates 15 associated with landsliding produced from the full set of such studies globally would be a useful aid to 16 the selection of covariates in future logistic regression studies. Thus, studies using logistic regression 17 for landslide susceptibility estimation published in the literature were collated and a database created 18 of the significant factors affecting the generation of landslides. The database records the paper the 19 data were taken from, the year of publication, the approximate longitude and latitude of the study 20 area, the trigger method (where appropriate), and the most dominant type of landslides occurring in 21 the study area. The significant and non-significant (at the 95% confidence level) covariates were 22 recorded, as well as their coefficient, statistical significance, and unit of measurement. The most 23 common statistically significant covariate used in landslide logistic regression was slope, followed by 24 aspect. The significant covariates related to landsliding varied for earthquake-induced landslides 25 compared to rainfall-induced landslides, and between landslide type. More importantly, the full range 26 of covariates used was identified along with their frequencies of inclusion. The analysis showed that 27 2 there needs to be more clarity and consistency in the methodology for selecting covariates for logistic 28 regression analysis and in the metrics included when presenting the results. Several recommendations 29 for future studies were given. 30 31