Vulnerability Dimensions and Access to Affordable Housing: The Case of the Waste Picker Community in Amritsar City, India

Abstract

Concentration of urban poverty within the milieu of rampant urbanization in the neoliberalist era and its manifestation in the forms of informalities in housing and infrastructure access and occupation has become more of a rule rather than an exception in cities of the developing world. The Indian cities are no exception to this trend. However, the filtration of the benefits aiming to remove urban disparities by providing access to housing and infrastructure to the most vulnerable poor communities has remained elusive. Resultantly, the poorest sections continue to remain "invisible" on the radar of the city housing reforms and provision agenda. Left to fend for themselves, they respond by creating informal and precarious housing solutions on their own, sadly unrecognized and sidelined by state interventions. The research article investigates the vulnerabilities afflicting the waste picker community through detangling physical, social, economic, and politico-legal vulnerability dimensions and their access to affordable housing in the formal sector. The article argues that affordable housing remains more of an allegory than a veracity for the most vulnerable communities such as the waste pickers and emphasizes recognition of the multidimensional vulnerabilities and protecting their right to live with dignity, free of contestations and threat of evictions.

Affordable Housing with Prefabricated Construction Technology in India: An Approach to Sustainable Supply

“…Worldwide, 32% of the world's urban population (924 million people) live in substandard quality shelters with inadequate access to basic requirements of water supply and sanitation (2). In recent years, a drastic escalation has been seen in house prices across the globe.…”

“…In the recent decade, rapid industrialization has resulted in continuous rural-urban migration, and urban regions are bursting at the seams with people, resulting in pressure on the available housing stock. The majority of migrants were forced to live in slums and squatter colonies due to increasing property and land prices (2). The housing sector found itself in a paradoxical situation where houses remained vacant but the majority of inhabitants lived in areas marked as substandard housing stock and congestion.…”

Community Participation in Urban Land and Housing Delivery: Evidence from Kerala (India) and Dar es Salaam (Tanzania)

“…Globally, more than one billion people live in informal settlements, many of whom have limited or no access to decent housing, legal tenure, or adequate basic infrastructure services such as water and sanitation [12]. With formal housing provisions unable to keep pace with demand, and additional barriers like affordability and legal status precluding access to the formal market for low-income and other disadvantaged groups, large portions of the population occupy land that may be peripheral or poorly connected to the wider urban area, hazardous, or illegally settled, and live in poorly constructed homes that are unable to withstand even minor shocks [13].…”