2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability of bank filtration systems to climate change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
1
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
55
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However there are no catchment-scale or experimental data which demonstrate that this zone is effective in mitigating pollutant loads in managed landscapes (Smith et al, 2008). Sprenger et al (2011) found that bank filtration processes are vulnerable to climate change due to the drastically shortened travel time during flood events.…”
Section: Surface Water Wetlands and Groundwater-dependent Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However there are no catchment-scale or experimental data which demonstrate that this zone is effective in mitigating pollutant loads in managed landscapes (Smith et al, 2008). Sprenger et al (2011) found that bank filtration processes are vulnerable to climate change due to the drastically shortened travel time during flood events.…”
Section: Surface Water Wetlands and Groundwater-dependent Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inferences about the potential impact of future scenarios on pre-and post-treatment systems for BF systems in India can be drawn from various plausible sources/scenarios as well as from published literature on BF and climate change (Schoenheinz, 2004;Schoenheinz & Grischek, 2011;Sprenger et al, 2011). The impact of future scenarios or influencing factors on the quantity and quality of water, the consequent impact on BF systems and the coping strategies as well as potential post-treatment requirements for BF sites in India are described in Table 12.4.…”
Section: Post-treatment Requirements For Bf Sites In India In the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…RBF, which is an important part of managed aquifer recharge (MAR) systems (Rauch-Williams et al, 2010), has been used for water supplies in Europe along the Rhine, Elbe, Danube, and Seine Rivers for over a century (Schubert, 2002;Tufenkji et al, 2002) and it has provided the majority of the drinking water for large cities in Russia (Filimonova and Shtengelov, 2013), the USA Roy et al, 2012), China (Wu et al, 2007) and other countries (Hamdan et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2009;Polomčić et al, 2013;Shamsuddin et al, 2014) over the last few decades. The obvious advantage of RBF is the conjunctive use of infiltrated surface water and groundwater from the alluvial catchments of intake structures (Polomčić et al, 2013), which ensure long-term productivity and stability of the water supply (Sprenger et al, 2011). Additionally, surface water contaminants can be significantly removed or degraded as the infiltrating water moves from the river/lake to the production wells due to a combination of physicochemical and microbiological processes (Hiscock and Grischek, 2002;Maeng et al, 2010;Singh et al, 2010;Weiss et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%