Community Adaptation and Vulnerability in Arctic Regions 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9174-1_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability of Community Infrastructure to Climate Change in Nunavut: A Case Study From Arctic Bay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the analysis of local indicators of climate change appears to growingly attract the interest of the scientific community, especially in the natural sciences, the field suffers important weaknesses: primary data on the topic are not abundant, the methodological development is incipient, and the geographical extent is unbalanced. Furthermore, there have been very few previous attempts to classify local indicators of climate change, all of them using data from a single case study . The field could, therefore, benefit from (1) building more closely on the experience of social scientists working with local peoples, (2) homogenizing the methodological approach, and (3) covering previously neglected geographic areas or climatic regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the analysis of local indicators of climate change appears to growingly attract the interest of the scientific community, especially in the natural sciences, the field suffers important weaknesses: primary data on the topic are not abundant, the methodological development is incipient, and the geographical extent is unbalanced. Furthermore, there have been very few previous attempts to classify local indicators of climate change, all of them using data from a single case study . The field could, therefore, benefit from (1) building more closely on the experience of social scientists working with local peoples, (2) homogenizing the methodological approach, and (3) covering previously neglected geographic areas or climatic regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2005; Symon et al. 2005), and complex emerging vulnerabilities associated with these changes (Ford, Smit & Wandel 2006). Vulnerability as a concept for analysing impacts to communities typically indicates susceptibility to negative impacts or degradation from change (Adger 2006), and can be defined as “the conditions, determined by environmental, social, economic and political factors and processes in a system, which make the system more susceptible to harm” (UNISDR 2004).…”
Section: Vulnerabilty and Changing Arctic Livelihoodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2005), and the influence of technological and social changes on perceptions of weather, climate and other environmental conditions (Walsh et al. 2005; Ford, Smit & Wandel 2006; Gearheard et al. 2006).…”
Section: A Case Study Of Weather and Herdingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functioning of the present‐day Arctic coastal system is also influenced by permafrost degradation (e.g., Wobus et al, ), storm‐surge floodings (e.g., Pisaric et al, ), increased sediment supply from glacial catchments (e.g., Mercier & Laffly, ), and even such extreme events as tsunamis (e.g., Buchwał, Szczuciński, Strzelecki, & Long, ; Dahl‐Jensen et al, ; Long, Szczuciński, & Lawrence, ). Majority of those changes have a strong impact on circum‐polar Arctic coastal communities and their historical (including archaeological) and modern infrastructure (e.g., Ford, Bell, & St‐Hilaire‐Gravel, ; Gorokhovich, Leiserowitz, & Dugan, ; Hatcher & Forbes, ; Mason, Jordan, Lestak, & Manley, ; Radosavljevic et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%