2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-017-2029-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability of grazing and confined livestock in the Northern Great Plains to projected mid- and late-twenty-first century climate

Abstract: The Northern Great Plains (NGP) region of the USA-which comprises Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska-is a largely rural area that provides numerous ecosystem services, including livestock products, cultural services, and conservation of biological diversity. The region contains 25% of the Nation's beef cattle and approximately one-third of the confined beef cattle, as well as the largest remaining native prairie in the US-the Northern Mixedgrass Prairie. With rising atmospheri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(107 reference statements)
1
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the US, direct livestock losses due to heat stress are estimated to be $2.4 billion annually from decreased reproduction rates, feed consumption, and feed efficiency affecting animal growth rates [34][35][36][37]. Lower forage and feed quality are also expected [38] as increased temperatures negatively affect growth conditions and nutrient availability [39]. In Texas, warmer and drier conditions are expected to reduce total livestock production through lower stocking rates and reduced per animal production.…”
Section: Agricultural Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the US, direct livestock losses due to heat stress are estimated to be $2.4 billion annually from decreased reproduction rates, feed consumption, and feed efficiency affecting animal growth rates [34][35][36][37]. Lower forage and feed quality are also expected [38] as increased temperatures negatively affect growth conditions and nutrient availability [39]. In Texas, warmer and drier conditions are expected to reduce total livestock production through lower stocking rates and reduced per animal production.…”
Section: Agricultural Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ [23][24][25][26][27][28] Texas: warmer and drier climate-reduced crop yields and increased losses due to extreme weather events [29,30] Texas: lower soil moisture leading to increased aquifer pumping and water stress [31] Texas: increased frequency of pest, disease, and invasive species which raises crop management costs [28,32] Livestock Increased heat stress and reduced forage and feed growth [33] Livestock losses from decreased reproduction rates, feed consumption, and feed efficiency affecting animal growth rates [34][35][36][37] Lower forage and feed quality due to increased temperatures affecting growth and nutrient availability [38,39] Texas: lower stocking rates and reduced per animal production due to warmer and drier conditions [33] Texas: increased supplemental feeding due to lower grassland growth rates, quality, and acreage with the expansion of woody plants [40] Texas: decreased animal productivity due to the expansion and greater incidence of disease, ectoparasites, and other pests [30,40,41] Supply Chain…”
Section: Climate Impacts On Agriculture Citationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformations not just of production systems but of farmers livelihoods have evolved as another adaptation option in livestock systems. Some examples include the shifting in choice of livestock in addition to, or the replacement to, other species, and moving from cropping to livestock farming in response to a changing rainfall and more frequent drought occurrences (e.g., [10,54]). There was no further information found from these studies as to further evaluations of such transformational adaptation.…”
Section: Main Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the effect of climate variability on large herbivore production (LHP) is central to sustainable and effective rangeland management and planning (McKeon et al 1990, O'Reagain et al 2009, Derner et al 2018, Shrum et al 2018. Rangeland ecosystems worldwide are characterized by high precipitation variability, which creates management challenges for livestock producers seeking to match forage production with livestock demand in a proactive manner to prevent resource degradation and optimize livestock production (O'Reagain et al 2009, Derner and.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%