2002
DOI: 10.1049/ip-gtd:20020173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability of hydropower projects to climate change

Abstract: Gaseous emissions from fossil-fuelled electricity generation are major contributors to climate change. Limiting the extent of such change will depend, among other things, on the continuing and increased use of renewable sources including hydropower. Paradoxically, climate change itself may alter the availability of this natural resource, adversely affecting the financial viability of both existing and potential schemes. Here, a model is described to assess the relationship between changes in climate and the vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thermal power plant vulnerability can be reduced by utilizing alternative water sources, such as municipal wastewater, or by utilizing a dry-cooling system, yet there are cost, performance and availability trade-offs and constraints (EPRI, 2003;Gadhamshetty et al, 2006). Reservoirs and river levels may also be affected by climate change, altering water availability and hydropower performance capabilities and output (Harrison and Whittington, 2002;IPCC, 2008). Electricity generation units can affect water quality through thermal and chemical pollution.…”
Section: Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal power plant vulnerability can be reduced by utilizing alternative water sources, such as municipal wastewater, or by utilizing a dry-cooling system, yet there are cost, performance and availability trade-offs and constraints (EPRI, 2003;Gadhamshetty et al, 2006). Reservoirs and river levels may also be affected by climate change, altering water availability and hydropower performance capabilities and output (Harrison and Whittington, 2002;IPCC, 2008). Electricity generation units can affect water quality through thermal and chemical pollution.…”
Section: Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the analysis of the impact of land-use and climate changes on river hydrology and surface water availability can be addressed by means of spatially distributed rainfall-runoff model applications (Harrison & Whittington, 2002;Eckhardt & Ulbrich, 2003;Haverkamp et al, 2005). Well-known models that are commonly applied at the basin scale are the Hydrologic Simulation Package Fortran (HSPF; Holtan & Lopez, 1971), the Système Hydrologique Européen (SHE; Abbott et al, 1986a,b), the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT; Arnold et al, 1998) and the Hydrologic Engineering Centre Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS; HEC, 2000), amongst others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydroclimate models can be used to understand glacier and snowmelt dynamics (Huss et al, 2008;Jonsdottir, 2008;Schaefli et al, 2007;Johannesson, 2006), but they can also be linked with energy market models to understand financial and technical feasibility; economic vulnerability to climate change (Cherry et al, 2005b;Harrison et al, 2003;Harrison and Whittington, 2002); and they can provide a methodological approach to understand tradeoffs (Rheinheimer et al, 2013). Because getting to detailed, precise information at the watershed scale requires intensive effort and significant computing power, these methods have mostly been applied to case studies of particular basins (Bennett et al, 2012;Shrestha et al, 2012 in the Far North).…”
Section: Long-term Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%