2007
DOI: 10.1080/17450120701403144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerable children in families affected by parental mental illness: The role of theory in programme development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though frameworks can assist practitioners to think critically and broadly about the interventions they provide and the evaluations they apply [41], it is not unusual for mental health practitioners to find it difficult to describe the theoretical (or otherwise) basis of their work [42]. Nonetheless, a family-focused recovery framework is important as it might be used to understand mental health problems, within the context of families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though frameworks can assist practitioners to think critically and broadly about the interventions they provide and the evaluations they apply [41], it is not unusual for mental health practitioners to find it difficult to describe the theoretical (or otherwise) basis of their work [42]. Nonetheless, a family-focused recovery framework is important as it might be used to understand mental health problems, within the context of families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lacking theory, evaluators may focus only on outcomes related to objectives and fail to identify potential negative impacts of the intervention (James et al, 2007). Lastly, the absence of theory may make it difficult to explain a program's results, thereby limiting the potential of formulating recommendations to stakeholders for developing the program further or applying it to another context (D'Agostino, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the majority of planning scholars, the logic model program is the most appropriate program to achieve consensus and it is an important method for transparency of the way (10-13). Therefore, it seems that incorporation of supporting program based upon logic model using qualitative data to provide program content is the best type of program codification (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%