Vulnerable employment in developing economies: The case of sub‐Saharan African countries

Abstract

This study investigates the development of vulnerable employment in 43 sub‐Saharan African countries by using yearly data for 1996–2018 period. The paper first outlines the main factors and discusses the issue from the perspective of developing countries, and then constructs a panel data elasticity model. The model expands the economic growth framework further and assesses the effects of rurality, sectoral composition, demography, and the quality of economic and political institutions. Prais–Winsten robust estimation results for the expanded model show nonindustrial employment to be the main source of vulnerable employment. Additionally, the increase in urban population share is found to have a positive impact, while nonemployed population is negatively associated. The results also show that upper‐middle income countries differ from low and lower‐middle income groups with regard to the significance of economic and political institutions. These findings clarify the prominence of the Sustainable Development Goals policy agenda and gradual reform strategies beginning with economic quality toward improvement of political institutions. At the end, we highlight several policy implications.

Towards sustainability: The relationship between foreign direct investment, economic freedom and inclusive green growth

“…Both trade openness and foreign aid also appear to hinder IGG in SSA, although the effects are quite sensitive to model specification. The harmful effect of trade openness is not surprising per evidence that it can intensify income inequality, energy intensity, and ecological footprint in regions where informality is high and the energy systems are in their nascent stages of development (IEA, 2019;Erkul & Külünk, 2022).…”

Globalization and the proportion of women in vulnerable employment in sub‐Saharan Africa: The role of economic, social, and political conditions

“…Vulnerability is also affected by rurality, sectoral composition, demography, and quality of institutions. As Erkul and Külünk (2022) revealed, non‐industrial employment and increased urbanization drive vulnerability, while a non‐employed population is negatively associated with increased vulnerable employment. On the other hand, the impacts of quality of economic and political institutions differ across income level.…”

The Relationship between Gross Domestic Product, Foreign Direct Investments, Inflation Rate and Unemployment in Selected ASEAN Countries

“…Di Indonesia, Pengangguran dan kekurangan peluang pekerjaan masih menjadi permasalahan utama pekerjaan. Indonesia mempunyai 64.4 peratus penduduk yang dikategorikan sebagai kumpulan pekerja terdedah (Erkul & Külünk, 2022). Kewujudan kumpulan pekerja terdedah mengakibatkan jurang pengagihan pendapatan di Indonesia.…”