1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1988.tb01148.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulvar Paget's Disease with an Underlying Sweat Gland Adenocarcinoma

Abstract: Vulvar Paget's disease, in contrast to its mammary counterpart, has been found to be associated with an underlying apocrine sweat gland carcinoma in about only 1/4 of the cases. There are two principal theories regarding the pathogenesis of extramammary Paget's disease: (1) intraepidermal origin of the Paget cells occurring independently of, or concomitantly with, an underlying apocrine gland carcinoma, and (2) the migration or metastasis of Paget cells into the epidermis from the underlying apocrine glands an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 The first theory proposes that the intraepidermal origin of Paget cells have the potential to be associated with an apocrine gland carcinoma; the second theory proposes that it arises from the metastasis of Paget cells into the epidermis from the underlying apocrine glands. 6 The exact incidence of EMPD is not known but is estimated to account for 1% to 6% of all Paget disease cases. 7 Management of EMPD is challenging due to the multifocal presentation and lack of correlation between gross and microscopic borders of the lesion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The first theory proposes that the intraepidermal origin of Paget cells have the potential to be associated with an apocrine gland carcinoma; the second theory proposes that it arises from the metastasis of Paget cells into the epidermis from the underlying apocrine glands. 6 The exact incidence of EMPD is not known but is estimated to account for 1% to 6% of all Paget disease cases. 7 Management of EMPD is challenging due to the multifocal presentation and lack of correlation between gross and microscopic borders of the lesion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%