Lexikon Statistik 1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-91144-5_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

W

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of deuterium trapped in carbon on the deuterium refiedion was studied with the Monte Carlo program TRIM.SP in the energy range from 20 eV to 2 keV [S] for a composition C0,7D0.J ( fig.2). The sum of sputtered and backscattered deuterium gives nearly the same value as the reflection coefficient from pure carbon, but the energy distribution of the sputtered deuterium is shifted to lower energies compared to the energy distribution of the backscattered particles [5].…”
Section: Hydrogen Partlcle Balancementioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influence of deuterium trapped in carbon on the deuterium refiedion was studied with the Monte Carlo program TRIM.SP in the energy range from 20 eV to 2 keV [S] for a composition C0,7D0.J ( fig.2). The sum of sputtered and backscattered deuterium gives nearly the same value as the reflection coefficient from pure carbon, but the energy distribution of the sputtered deuterium is shifted to lower energies compared to the energy distribution of the backscattered particles [5].…”
Section: Hydrogen Partlcle Balancementioning
confidence: 89%
“…They should be compared with the results of computer simulation programs such as the WBC [23] and the ERO 124) code. Calculated particle reflection coefficient R, and hydrogen sputtering coefficient Y(H) for pun nickel and hydrogen containing nickel and for carbon targeu (program TRSPVMC) [5]. F i g 2 Energy distributions of backscattered and sputtered deuterium due to the bombardment of deuterium implanted carbon, (&Do.3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The irradiation times of Figure 2(a-c) were 1, 3, and 10 h, respectively. [47] Thus, the difference in the sputtering yield could have led to the difference in the morphology changes (nanocones for Ti and FNs for Nb). Also, the difference in the ion flux by~20 % (2:4 À 3:1 Â 10 22 m À2 ) had a minor effect, considering the fact the irradiationtime was changed by a factor of three or greater.…”
Section: Morphology Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the energy range of 70-100 eV, the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 sputtering yield of Nb by He bombardment is 2-4 10 À3 , [46] which is one order of magnitude less than that for Ti. [47] Thus, the difference in the sputtering yield could have led to the difference in the morphology changes (nanocones for Ti and FNs for Nb). Figure 3(d) shows a color mapping of Nb (green) and oxygen (red) of the structure shown in Figure 3(c).…”
Section: Morphology Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interpretation, however, does not account for all observed ∆δ and ∆ν values, and especially not for the divergences within the series of compounds 1. To our surprise, a recent X-ray study of a similar xanthine derivative 7 [11] showed linear strands with consecutive xanthine and Rh* molecules where one Rh* entity complexes to a C-2 carbonyl group on each side, whereas the next Rh* complexes to two C-6 carbonyls (Scheme 6). [12] It thus follows that there is an equilibrium between kinetically unstable complexes with different binding sites in solution.…”
Section: Binding Sites and Binding Modementioning
confidence: 99%