1992
DOI: 10.2331/suisan.58.1447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

W-Shaped Auditory Threshold Curves of Masu Salmon Oncorhynchus masou.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is necessary to conduct experiments on fish in air using this new method and to compare the results with those of previous studies. 6,7,[13][14][15][16][17][18] Sound pressure values in the audiogram obtained in the present experiment were higher than those obtained by Chapman and Sand 23 and by Zhang et al 19 (Fig. 9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is necessary to conduct experiments on fish in air using this new method and to compare the results with those of previous studies. 6,7,[13][14][15][16][17][18] Sound pressure values in the audiogram obtained in the present experiment were higher than those obtained by Chapman and Sand 23 and by Zhang et al 19 (Fig. 9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…But it is possible to obtain sound pressure thresholds for pressure‐sensitive fish that have swim bladders using the two‐speaker system that fixes fish in water. It is necessary to conduct experiments on fish in air using this new method and to compare the results with those of previous studies 6,7 , 13–18 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fish may also detect sound indirectly when the otoliths receive displacement inputs from the walls of the swimbladder or other gas‐filled chambers near the ears as they change their volume due to sound pressure fluctuations 23 Figure 6. presents the audiograms of jack mackerel, together with several demersal and pelagic hearing generalist fish species 24–30 relative to the payao sound spectrum. The most sensitive frequencies of demersal species such as red sea bream Pagrus major , rockfish Sebastes schlegeli and flatfish Paralichthys olivaceus , or those in high‐energy habitats like salmon Oncorhynchus masou , are generally less than 200 Hz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these species, the pressure component of the passing sound cannot be picked up and transmitted into the inner ear and hence the hearing ability is limited. Figure 3.4 shows audiograms obtained from several commercially harvested species: bastard halibut (Fujieda et al 1996 ), red sea bream (Ishioka et al 1988 ), jacopever ( Sebastes schlegeli ) (Motomatsu et al 1996 ), walleye pollock ( Theragra (Akamatsu et al 2003 ), and masu salmon ( Oncorhynchus masou ) (Kojima et al 1992 ). Although sound frequencies were limited to 2000 Hz during tests, the audiograms clearly indicate that the most sensitive frequency range lies between 100 and 1000 Hz.…”
Section: Hearing Abilities Of Fishmentioning
confidence: 99%