“…The studies selected for inclusion from the literature had a variety of different methods used to collect data. There were 26 that followed a primarily qualitative research design (Bruner et al, 2019 ; Fraser et al, 2015 ; Freeman, 2017 ; Goodkind et al, 2012 ; Hatala et al, 2017 , 2019 , 2020 ; Isaacson, 2018 ; Kral et al, 2014 ; Krieg, 2016 ; McMahon et al, 2013 ; Morton et al, 2020 ; Njeze et al, 2020 ; Ranahan & Yuen, 2017 ; Rasmus et al, 2014 ; Sasakamoose et al, 2016 ; Strickland & Cooper, 2011 ; Trout et al, 2018 ; Ulturgasheva et al, 2014 ; Ungar et al, 2008 ; Victor et al, 2016 ; Wexler, 2014 ; Wexler et al, 2013 , 2014 , 2016 ; Wood et al, 2018 ); 8 followed a quantitative design (Ames et al, 2015 ; Baldwin et al, 2011 ; Barnett et al, 2020 ; Fitzgerald et al 2017 ; Gray et al, 2016 ; Kenyon & Carter, 2011 ; Mohatt et al 2011 ; Snowshoe et al, 2017 ); and 10 were mixed methods studies (Clark et al, 2013 ; Gray et al, 2019 ; Harder et al, 2015 ; Ruttan et al, 2008 ; Pertucka et al, 2016 ; Ritchie et al, 2015 ; Sam et al, 2015 ; Stumblingbear-Riddle, 2012 ; Tiessen et al, 2009 ; Yeh et al, 2015 ). Community-consulted focus groups that used open-ended, semi-structured interviews were the most commonly used in qualitative and mixed-methods studies.…”