2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2013.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wage rigidity and employment adjustment at the firm level: Evidence from survey data

Abstract: This paper uses firm level survey data from Portugal to investigate how firms adjust their labour costs in the presence of wage rigidities. We document that Portuguese firms, besides reducing employment or freezing nominal base wages, also make frequent use of other cost-cutting strategies, like freezing or cutting bonus and other monetary or non-monetary benefits, slowing down or freezing the rate at which promotions are filled, or recruiting new employees at wages lower than those received by the employees t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earnings are defined as annual 'reckonable' income for the calendar year 6 ; this is gross income from all sources including bonuses and taxable benefits-in-kind after pension contributions, which are not taxable, have been deducted. 7 The fact that irregular earnings are included is important because firms can adjust labour costs through these components as well as basic pay; for evidence on the widespread use of adjustments to non-core pay, see Babecky et al (2012), Du Caju et al (2013) and Dias et al (2013). In addition, firms can react to labour market shocks by changing hours of work, so we believe that data on earnings are the most appropriate for capturing the flexibility firms have in adjusting costs.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earnings are defined as annual 'reckonable' income for the calendar year 6 ; this is gross income from all sources including bonuses and taxable benefits-in-kind after pension contributions, which are not taxable, have been deducted. 7 The fact that irregular earnings are included is important because firms can adjust labour costs through these components as well as basic pay; for evidence on the widespread use of adjustments to non-core pay, see Babecky et al (2012), Du Caju et al (2013) and Dias et al (2013). In addition, firms can react to labour market shocks by changing hours of work, so we believe that data on earnings are the most appropriate for capturing the flexibility firms have in adjusting costs.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dias et al . () provide evidence that firms with more flexible base wages are less likely to reduce employment, and that such effect may be significantly strengthened by the availability of alternative margins of labor‐cost adjustment that firms can use in bad times. The questionnaire included a question that attempted to capture the importance of these margins.…”
Section: Assessing Nominal Wage Rigiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Babecký et al (2012) highlight the substitutability between base wage flexibility and alternative labour cost adjustments: firms facing base wage rigidities, defined as firms freezing wages, are more likely to use alternative margins. Using microdata on Portugal, Dias et al (2013) find that firms with more flexible base wages, which they define as firms that freeze wages, are less likely to reduce employment. This is strengthened by the availability of alternative labour cost adjustment mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%