1998
DOI: 10.1177/002218569804000106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wages Policy and Wage Determination in 1997

Abstract: hereafter IN&dquo;orkplace Relations Act) provided a new formal framework for wages policy and wage determination. It became the third change of this nature in five years. Despite the rhetoric, this is not the latest phase in the inevitable 'deregulation' of the Australian labour market. On the contrary, developments throughout the year confirmed the continuing relevance of Polanyi's famous dictum: laissezfaii-e has to be planned.' Like all 'deregulatory' projects (including those of the former Labor governmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The commission's decision signifies that, in the current climate of high unemployment, especially among those sections of the population from which many hospitality workers are drawn, the balance of power has swung strongly in the employers' favour. However, the determination was not an absolute defeat for hospitality workers; the notion of an award establishing standard conditions was not entirely abandoned (AIRC, 1997: 3, 38-9; SMH, 24 December 1997b; Buchanan et al, 1998: 100).…”
Section: Interpreting the Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commission's decision signifies that, in the current climate of high unemployment, especially among those sections of the population from which many hospitality workers are drawn, the balance of power has swung strongly in the employers' favour. However, the determination was not an absolute defeat for hospitality workers; the notion of an award establishing standard conditions was not entirely abandoned (AIRC, 1997: 3, 38-9; SMH, 24 December 1997b; Buchanan et al, 1998: 100).…”
Section: Interpreting the Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%