1990
DOI: 10.1177/073428299000800102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WAIS-R Reliability and Standard Errors for Persons 75 to 79, 80 to 84, and 85 and Older

Abstract: Reliability of the WAIS-R for a sample of 226 normal elderly volunteers was determined. Subjects were divided into three age groups: 75 to 79, 80 to 84, and 85 and older. For each group, internal consistency estimates and standard errors of measurement (Sem1), estimation (Sem2), and prediction (Sem3) were calculated for the IQs and subtests. Vocabulary (.96 to .92) was consistently the most reliable subtest, while Picture Arrangement (.71 to .54) and Object Assembly (.74 to .56) were the least reliable. The su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicating decline in the latest period of human development are consistent with those found in the standardization sample of the WAIS-R, through ages 70-74 (Kaufman et al, 1989), and in the standardization of the WAIS-R for 226 elderly individuals ages 75 and above (Ryan & Paolo, in press;Ryan, Paolo, & Brungardt, 1990). In the results of the present study we find that the decline after age 75 years is substantial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These results indicating decline in the latest period of human development are consistent with those found in the standardization sample of the WAIS-R, through ages 70-74 (Kaufman et al, 1989), and in the standardization of the WAIS-R for 226 elderly individuals ages 75 and above (Ryan & Paolo, in press;Ryan, Paolo, & Brungardt, 1990). In the results of the present study we find that the decline after age 75 years is substantial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%