1986
DOI: 10.1177/002248718603700110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wait Time: Slowing Down May Be A Way of Speeding Up!

Abstract: The wait time concept has become a significant dimension in the research on teaching. When teachers ask students ques tions, they typically wait less than one second for a student response. Further, after a student stops speaking, teachers react or respond with another question in less than one second. The concepts of wait time 1 (pausing after asking a question) and wait time 2 (pausing after a student response) are discussed in this article by Rowe. She reviews the literature on wait time and describes the e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
197
1
12

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
197
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing wait time by a few seconds had several positive effects on the attitudes and behaviors of both students and teachers. 21 Longer wait times consistently resulted in longer student responses, an increase in the number of students volunteering to respond, and an increase in the number of followup questions posed by students. Students significantly reduced the frequency of "I don't know" responses and student achievement scores on tests significantly increased.…”
Section: Wait Timementioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Increasing wait time by a few seconds had several positive effects on the attitudes and behaviors of both students and teachers. 21 Longer wait times consistently resulted in longer student responses, an increase in the number of students volunteering to respond, and an increase in the number of followup questions posed by students. Students significantly reduced the frequency of "I don't know" responses and student achievement scores on tests significantly increased.…”
Section: Wait Timementioning
confidence: 98%
“…2 When a teacher uses higher-order questions, ones that require complex cognitive processes, it may be necessary to provide 1 to 2 minutes of wait time before soliciting responses from students. 21,22 A series of wait time studies involving both small groups and large classes was conducted. 21,23,24 Wait times were manipulated with student participants at various levels of cognitive development, ranging from elementary school through university classrooms, to determine the optimal wait time and potential benefits for both students and teachers.…”
Section: Wait Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Defined as the silent duration between a teacher elicitation and student response, research suggests that by extending their silent wait time after solicits, teachers can improve the quality of classroom discourse and combat student non-responsiveness (Rowe 1986;Shrum 1985). In a recent mixed methods investigation into instances of wait time within a UK university second language classroom, Smith and King (2017) discovered that wait time played an intricate role in shaping classroom discourse patterns, with extended wait times of more than 2 s in length working to temporarily shift discourse out of a rigid Initiation Response Feedback (IRF) pattern (see Sinclair and Coulthard 1975) into a new, more student-driven phase.…”
Section: Silence In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More and more students participate in responding. Furthermore, students ask more questions and talk more to other students [6].…”
Section: Research Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%