2010
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181cbcd96
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wakefulness and loss of awareness

Abstract: Global neuronal workspace theory predicts that damage to long-distance white matter tracts should impair access to conscious perception. During persistent vegetative state, we identified a hypermetabolism in the ascending reticular activating system (ARAS) and impaired functional connectivity between the ARAS and the precuneus. This result emphasizes the functional link between cortices and brainstem in the genesis of perceptual awareness and strengthens the hypothesis that consciousness is based on a widespre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…26,29,31,32,35,36,38,41,42 In several studies, when compared with subjects in the MCS, patients in VS had proportionally greater reductions in activity in the precuneus and in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). 26,35,39 This reduction in activity in the precuneus was coupled with increased activity in brainstem arousal centers in one study. 39 In patients with VS, widespread reductions in activity were noted within exteroceptive (left and right lateral parietal and lateral prefrontal cortices) and interoceptive systems (midline precuneus/posterior cingulate and mesiofrontal/anterior cingulate cortices), while in MCS, reduced activity was observed in interoceptive systems only, and in EMCS, reduced activity was noted only in the PCC.…”
Section: Systematic Review Population Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…26,29,31,32,35,36,38,41,42 In several studies, when compared with subjects in the MCS, patients in VS had proportionally greater reductions in activity in the precuneus and in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). 26,35,39 This reduction in activity in the precuneus was coupled with increased activity in brainstem arousal centers in one study. 39 In patients with VS, widespread reductions in activity were noted within exteroceptive (left and right lateral parietal and lateral prefrontal cortices) and interoceptive systems (midline precuneus/posterior cingulate and mesiofrontal/anterior cingulate cortices), while in MCS, reduced activity was observed in interoceptive systems only, and in EMCS, reduced activity was noted only in the PCC.…”
Section: Systematic Review Population Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…26,35,39 This reduction in activity in the precuneus was coupled with increased activity in brainstem arousal centers in one study. 39 In patients with VS, widespread reductions in activity were noted within exteroceptive (left and right lateral parietal and lateral prefrontal cortices) and interoceptive systems (midline precuneus/posterior cingulate and mesiofrontal/anterior cingulate cortices), while in MCS, reduced activity was observed in interoceptive systems only, and in EMCS, reduced activity was noted only in the PCC. 29 Two SPECT and 4 PET studies evaluated patients with TBI separately (table e-2).…”
Section: Systematic Review Population Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8,9 Contrary to what several definitions state, the presence of rest periods does not always imply preserved electrophysiological sleep-wake cycles nor sleep stages that should no longer be taken as a distinguishing feature for the definition of UWS or MCS. 24,25 The waking state and sleep stages do not fit the elder standard scoring criteria, which therefore needs to be adapted for polysomnography in DOC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in general anesthesia [52 ]) and pathological alterations of consciousness (e.g. [53,54,55 ,56 ]) provide evidence in favor of this hypothesis. For most neuroscientists, you are your brain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%