2019
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Walking Along Curved Trajectories. Changes With Age and Parkinson's Disease. Hints to Rehabilitation

Abstract: In this review, we briefly recall the fundamental processes allowing us to change locomotion trajectory and keep walking along a curved path and provide a review of contemporary literature on turning in older adults and people with Parkinson's Disease (PD). The first part briefly summarizes the way the body exploits the physical laws to produce a curved walking trajectory. Then, the changes in muscle and brain activation underpinning this task, and the promoting role of proprioception, are briefly considered. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 199 publications
(234 reference statements)
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that significant differences between straight and curved paths exist for both spatiotemporal and gait quality indices in CG and sTBI-S, whereas no statistical difference exists between the two walking modalities in sTBI-VS, indicating that this group of patients presents similar biomechanical patterns in the two conditions. This is in agreement with the existing literature focusing on straight versus curved walking and confirms that: (i) curved walking requires different adaptations (with respect to straight walking) in order to fit the biomechanical constraints imposed by linear and rotational dynamics of turning [ 2 , 31 ]; (ii) since these adaptations rely on the central nervous system which, during curved walking, takes over the control of locomotion at the expenses of the spinal automatisms [ 31 ], people with neurological disorders might encounter difficulties in managing the interplay between balance control and center of mass progression when steering and turning [ 8 ]; and, (iii) the kind and entity of the abovementioned adaptations depend on walking velocity [ 2 , 31 ]: when walking speed is very low (below 0.9 m·s −1 during straight walking), differences in the spatiotemporal and gait quality-related parameters between straight and curved locomotion may become negligible [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results show that significant differences between straight and curved paths exist for both spatiotemporal and gait quality indices in CG and sTBI-S, whereas no statistical difference exists between the two walking modalities in sTBI-VS, indicating that this group of patients presents similar biomechanical patterns in the two conditions. This is in agreement with the existing literature focusing on straight versus curved walking and confirms that: (i) curved walking requires different adaptations (with respect to straight walking) in order to fit the biomechanical constraints imposed by linear and rotational dynamics of turning [ 2 , 31 ]; (ii) since these adaptations rely on the central nervous system which, during curved walking, takes over the control of locomotion at the expenses of the spinal automatisms [ 31 ], people with neurological disorders might encounter difficulties in managing the interplay between balance control and center of mass progression when steering and turning [ 8 ]; and, (iii) the kind and entity of the abovementioned adaptations depend on walking velocity [ 2 , 31 ]: when walking speed is very low (below 0.9 m·s −1 during straight walking), differences in the spatiotemporal and gait quality-related parameters between straight and curved locomotion may become negligible [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar to healthy adults, in fact, they exhibited different walking patterns when performing straight and curvilinear paths. Specifically, consistent with what has been reported in previous literature [ 31 ], the more challenging gait modality induces a decrease in walking speed, an increase in stride duration, and a decrease in the stride frequency, with respect to the straight path ( Figure 2 ). This confirms that human subjects adapt their locomotor velocity to the radius of curvature of the path they are following, with the velocity that tends to increase when the trajectory becomes straighter and decrease when it becomes more curved [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This article will not address the mechanisms responsible for the maintenance of the erect stance under static conditions, either, even if during quiet stance, antero-posterior sway of the body occurs and can be easily detected [3]. Besides, this article will not deal with the automatic postural activities accompanying gait, be it simple walking along a linear path or more demanding walking as when we move along curved trajectories (e.g., [4,5]). As a further stipulation, we will not deal here with another type of perturbation, which has been popular in the past, consisting of the toe-up or toe-down tilt of the supporting platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%