“…Prior research on a neighborhood scale has discovered a relationship between walking for recreation and environmental factors, including land use mix [15], the availability of paths for walking [16], infrastructure for walking, including its condition and quality of the surface [17,18], the proximity of recreational facilities [16,18], the presence of accessible destinations such as stores, parks, and beaches [17,19], the presence of public transportation facilities [19,20], surrounding non-residential areas [21], perceived and actual traffic safety, including elements like the proportion of a street's length that has speed limits [16,19], less worry about crime and increased personal security [17,22], and the person's perception of the aesthetics of their area, as well as the presence of aesthetic elements such the amount of tree canopy covering, the upkeep of walkways, cleanliness, and the view of architecture [16,17,23]. Additionally, Borst et al [14] examined the connections between the perceived attractiveness of streets for walking and (physical) street characteristics.…”