2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Walking pattern efficiency during collective load transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When P1 or P2 were walking with the control, the RR of their pair remained at the same level as when they were walking alone. These values are comparable with those reported by Fumery et al ( 1 ) (i.e. RR ± CI 0.95 = 60.25 ± 7.59%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When P1 or P2 were walking with the control, the RR of their pair remained at the same level as when they were walking alone. These values are comparable with those reported by Fumery et al ( 1 ) (i.e. RR ± CI 0.95 = 60.25 ± 7.59%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a previous study (1) we showed that the gait of the system formed by a pair of healthy individuals walking together while transporting a box was as economical as that of healthy individuals walking alone. The current study tested the hypothesis that this is also true for pairs of patients with an intellectual disability.…”
Section: Lay Abstractmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is essential to conceive aids, exoskeletons and collaborative robots dedicated to assisting humans in such a task. Fumery et al, (2018) studied the energetic exchanges during a collective load carriage to investigate whether two individuals transporting an object behave economically. The authors showed that the external energetic exchanges occurring during this type of transport was as efficient as those occurring in single gait when the load is below 10% of the total body mass of the dyad.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%