2009
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2009.13.2675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wall-crossings in toric Gromov–Witten theory I: crepant examples

Abstract: Let X be a Gorenstein orbifold with projective coarse moduli space X and let Y be a crepant resolution of X . We state a conjecture relating the genus-zero GromovWitten invariants of X to those of Y , which differs in general from the Crepant Resolution Conjectures of Ruan and Bryan-Graber, and prove our conjecture when X D P .1; 1; 2/ and X D P .1; 1; 1; 3/. As a consequence, we see that the original form of the Bryan-Graber Conjecture holds for P .1; 1; 2/ but is probably false for P .1; 1; 1; 3/. Our method… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
201
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
6
201
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [1] this was used to calculate generating functions of orbifold GromovWitten invariants in the case of the C 3 /Z 3 orbifold, which corresponds to a phase in the moduli space of local P 2 , its crepant resolution. The predictions obtained in this way have been later verified mathematically in orbifold Gromov-Witten theory [11,17,20,25], and other examples have been recently calculated [18,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [1] this was used to calculate generating functions of orbifold GromovWitten invariants in the case of the C 3 /Z 3 orbifold, which corresponds to a phase in the moduli space of local P 2 , its crepant resolution. The predictions obtained in this way have been later verified mathematically in orbifold Gromov-Witten theory [11,17,20,25], and other examples have been recently calculated [18,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…. , k. Its mirror [37,42] -see also [24] for a clear explanation -is a B-twisted Landau-Ginzburg model on the family of algebraic tori π : V → M, with V = (C * ) 3+k , and M = (C * ) k , with projection map π : (y 0 , . .…”
Section: A Landau-ginzburg Vs Sigma Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since ρ is crepant, we have h = (1/ n i=0 w i )( n i=0 b i + d j=1 e j ) (see Fulton [11]). Since H is an ample line bundle (see [11,Section 3.4]), Lemma 3.1.1 shows that the Mori cone M ρ (Z) is generated by the set (10) [ (Z; C)(q 1 , q 2 , q 3 , q 4 ) ∼ = H CR P (1, 3, 4, 4); C which is an isometry with respect to the Poincaré pairing on H ρ (Z; C)(q 1 , q 2 , q 3 , q 4 ) and with respect to the Chen-Ruan pairing on H CR (P (1, 3, 4, 4); C).…”
Section: The Cohomological Crepant Resolution Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ruan's conjecture is discussed further and revised in §8 and §11 below. Bryan and Graber [7] recently proposed a refinement of Ruan's conjecture, applicable whenever X satisfies a Hard Lefschetz condition on orbifold cohomology [14]. They suggest that in this case the big quantum cohomology algebras of X and Y coincide after analytic continuation and specialization of quantum parameters, via a linear isomorphism that also matches certain pairings on the algebras.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%