2016
DOI: 10.2514/1.j054493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wall-Mounted Finite Airfoil-Noise Production and Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tip vortex formation noise appears to have no influence in the frequency range of interest since the peak predicted tip vortex formation noise is at approximately 20 kHz (not shown). Recently Moreau et al 26 developed an empirical model based on wall-mounted finite airfoil measurements for predicting tip vortex formation noise. According to that model, the peak tip vortex formation noise is expected to occur around Strouhal number based on chord of 22.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tip vortex formation noise appears to have no influence in the frequency range of interest since the peak predicted tip vortex formation noise is at approximately 20 kHz (not shown). Recently Moreau et al 26 developed an empirical model based on wall-mounted finite airfoil measurements for predicting tip vortex formation noise. According to that model, the peak tip vortex formation noise is expected to occur around Strouhal number based on chord of 22.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference is due to the differences in flow around the airfoil on which the models are based. The Moreau et al 26 model is based on span varying flow conditions while the BPM model assumes uniform flow characteristics across the span. According to these flow characteristics, the model by Moreau et al 26 appears to be more suited for predicting tip vortex formation noise of rotating airfoils at 10 pitch angle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Effective angle of attack as well as the Reynolds number is associated with Strouhal number st' and boundary layer height on the pressure side 𝛿 𝑃 . The empirical model can predict well the primary noise from a wall-mounted finite airfoil [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Without these, the generation of the airfoil whistle noise may not be understood and may inhibit an in-depth explanation of the measured results. Alternatively, analysis of dynamic cases such as oscillations of the trailing edge has gained interest recently [25]. It has also been proven that it has significant effects on the noise generated [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%