2010
DOI: 10.1097/00004583-201004000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

War and the Military Family

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Continued good health is a prerequisite to remaining in service; the term 'healthy warrior' acknowledges this as a potential source of bias in studies comparing military personnel who are deployed to a war zone and those who are not deployed for health reasons 12 , although the 'healthy warrior effect' differs from the 'healthy worker effect' in that it is predominantly used to refer to psychiatric diagnoses. Larson et al suggested that the initial months of training act as a de facto screening mechanism, whereby recruits with mental illness are least likely to continue in service 13,14 . This suggestion is supported by our findings, that long-term mental health is poorest amongst those who leave the Armed Forces earliest, and that those who serve longest have a reduced risk of mental health conditions in comparison with members of the wider community.…”
Section: 'Healthy Workers' and 'Less Healthy Leavers'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continued good health is a prerequisite to remaining in service; the term 'healthy warrior' acknowledges this as a potential source of bias in studies comparing military personnel who are deployed to a war zone and those who are not deployed for health reasons 12 , although the 'healthy warrior effect' differs from the 'healthy worker effect' in that it is predominantly used to refer to psychiatric diagnoses. Larson et al suggested that the initial months of training act as a de facto screening mechanism, whereby recruits with mental illness are least likely to continue in service 13,14 . This suggestion is supported by our findings, that long-term mental health is poorest amongst those who leave the Armed Forces earliest, and that those who serve longest have a reduced risk of mental health conditions in comparison with members of the wider community.…”
Section: 'Healthy Workers' and 'Less Healthy Leavers'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Youths of recently deployed personnel are at high risk for diffi culties in psychological functioning (Jensen et al, 1996;Peebles-Kleiger & Kleiger, 1994;Rosen et al, 1993 (Manos, 2010) such that millions of children are living in active duty or reserve military households. Children of deployed parents are at risk for high stress and anxiety, as well as diffi culties with their parents (Gibbs et al, 2007).…”
Section: Military Dependentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lester et al (2010), on the other hand, suggest that girls may externalize more than boys during deployment, with boys struggling more upon return and reintegration in ''adjusting to reduced autonomy and increased structure'' (p. 318). Manos (2010) takes the aforementioned evidence into consideration when noting that girls may indeed struggle more with behavioral problems overall than boys. Still, others have found that girls may struggle more with reintegration (RAND Corporation 2009), a phase that may be more difficult than sustainment (Huebner et al 2007).…”
Section: Effects Of Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A brief review of the literature reveals that employment and higher level of parental education (Flake et al 2009), parental adjustment and mental health (Lester et al 2010;Manos 2010;Chandra et al 2010), parental value of a child's education (Chandra et al 2010), parental support for children (Morris and Age 2009), appropriate communication around deployment (Huebner and Mancini 2010), clarity around issues of control (i.e., what can and cannot be changed; Huebner et al 2007) and the meaning attributed to deployment (Antonovsky and Sourani 1988;Wiens and Boss 2006;Mabe 2009;Lapp et al 2010) are all important variables in determining how a family responds to the pile-up of stressors associated with deployment. Wiens and Boss (2006) also suggest that family preparedness for deployment, flexible gender roles, and active coping strategies can increase a family's resilience during deployment.…”
Section: Protective Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%