2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

War, traumatic health shocks, and religiosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
3
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from both papers are consistent with the religious coping hypothesis. Cesur et al (2020) and Shai (2022) present evidence consistent with the idea that individuals turn to religion to cope with the effects of wars. For example, Cesur et al (2020) consider the causal effect of assigning US Armed Forces active-duty servicemen to combat instead of non-combat overseas deployment, finding a higher probability of attending religious services weekly and engaging in private prayer.…”
Section: Literaturesupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results from both papers are consistent with the religious coping hypothesis. Cesur et al (2020) and Shai (2022) present evidence consistent with the idea that individuals turn to religion to cope with the effects of wars. For example, Cesur et al (2020) consider the causal effect of assigning US Armed Forces active-duty servicemen to combat instead of non-combat overseas deployment, finding a higher probability of attending religious services weekly and engaging in private prayer.…”
Section: Literaturesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Cesur et al (2020) and Shai (2022) present evidence consistent with the idea that individuals turn to religion to cope with the effects of wars. For example, Cesur et al (2020) consider the causal effect of assigning US Armed Forces active-duty servicemen to combat instead of non-combat overseas deployment, finding a higher probability of attending religious services weekly and engaging in private prayer. Henrich et al (2019) similarly study the link between war and religiosity, finding that people from Uganda, Sierra Leone, and Tajikistan with greater exposure to wars show a higher religious activity even years after the conflict.…”
Section: Literaturesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…What are the broader implications of this study? First, our findings directly speak to research on the hypothesized link between exposure to war-related conflicts and religiosity (Cesur et al, 2020;Du & Chi, 2016;Henrich et al, 2019;Immerzeel & Van Tubergen, 2011;Keinan, 1994;Ruiter & Van Tubergen, 2009;Schuster et al, 2001;Shai, 2022;Sosis & Handwerker, 2011;Zussman, 2014). Although earlier work provided empirical support for the conflict-religiosity hypothesis, concerns about bias from selection and omitted variables remained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Yet, compelling evidence for the conflict-religiosity hypothesis is limited due to the possibility of endogenous selection, i.e., unobserved characteristics associated with people's religiosity and exposure to violent conflicts (Cesur, Freidman, & Sabia, 2020;Henrich et al, 2019;Shai, 2022;Zussman, 2014). In addition, earlier work has paid little attention to two different mechanisms that specify under which conditions violent conflicts lead to increased adherence to religious norms and religious coping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, in times of health distress, people are psychologically troubled and may turn to religion if additional psychological benefits (non-material motives) from religion raise utility and material advantages (Tan and Vogel, 2008;Stroope, 2012). Adverse life events introduced by the pandemic not only involve loss of livelihoods, but they also involve a trauma which makes the psychological benefits of religion greater for the sick than the sick but secular individual (Williams et al, 1991;Miller et al, 2012;Bentzen, 2019;Cesur et al, 2020). Earlier findings suggest a motivation for religious participation to extend beyond material consumption to include things like afterlife utility (Azzi and Ehrenberg, 1975), happiness (Dehejia et al, 2007), and protection against psychological harm, for instance, from marital separation (Clark and Lelkes, 2005).…”
Section: Equilibrium: Religion Participation Amidst Disease Outbreaksmentioning
confidence: 99%