2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Warfarin use in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation: decisions based on uncertainty

Abstract: BackgroundWarfarin prescribing patterns for hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation vary widely amongst nephrologists. This may be due to a paucity of guiding evidence, but also due to concerns of increased risks of warfarin use in this population. The literature lacks clarity on the balance of warfarin therapy between prevention of thrombotic strokes and the increased risks of bleeding in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation.MethodsWe performed a survey of Canadian Nephrologists, assessing wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, whether the benefits of oral anticoagulation extend to patients undergoing hemodialysis is unclear,(23-25) as they have a substantially higher risk of stroke compared to the general population, but also a higher risk of bleeding(13, 23-26). This clinical equipoise was reflected in a survey of Canadian nephrologists, where 72% were unsure about whether to initiate warfarin in hemodialysis patients with AF(27), and in the particularly low rate of warfarin use in hemodialysis patients with prevalent AF where one quarter were on warfarin. (28) In our study of a large cohort of patients on hemodialysis with newly-diagnosed AF, we found that only 15% of patients initiated warfarin use within 30 days of the index AF event; only roughly 11% of patients without an initially filled warfarin prescription initiated treatment between 30 days and one year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, whether the benefits of oral anticoagulation extend to patients undergoing hemodialysis is unclear,(23-25) as they have a substantially higher risk of stroke compared to the general population, but also a higher risk of bleeding(13, 23-26). This clinical equipoise was reflected in a survey of Canadian nephrologists, where 72% were unsure about whether to initiate warfarin in hemodialysis patients with AF(27), and in the particularly low rate of warfarin use in hemodialysis patients with prevalent AF where one quarter were on warfarin. (28) In our study of a large cohort of patients on hemodialysis with newly-diagnosed AF, we found that only 15% of patients initiated warfarin use within 30 days of the index AF event; only roughly 11% of patients without an initially filled warfarin prescription initiated treatment between 30 days and one year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OR < 1), but they may lacked statistical power to detect significant associations due to small sample size (N = 290). Given the high prevalence of frailty among HD patients [38, 39], and the high risk of adverse outcomes such as falls in this population [40, 41], physicians are reluctant to prescribe warfarin [25]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the unclear survival benefit, lack of association with stroke reduction, and increased risk of bleeding associated with warfarin use in patients with ESRD [1417], clinicians are faced with uncertainty about this treatment decision in this population [25]. Little is known about the use of warfarin in older adults with ESRD, especially about which patients are most likely to initiate this therapy after AF diagnosis and how their utilization changes after initiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there remains a degree of uncertainty as to the net benefit, and a rigorous RCT would provide a higher level of evidence to answer this question than the previous observational studies (55). Secondly, nephrologists and patients may have strong preferences for or against anticoagulation that may limit recruitment, although in a Canadian survey of nephrologists, the majority indicated that they would be willing to enroll their patients in such a trial (37). Finally, funding is unlikely to come from the pharmaceutical industry as generic warfarin is cheap and bioequivalent to brand-name warfarin (56), so it would likely need to be sourced publicly.…”
Section: Need For a Rctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of 56 Canadian nephrologists found agreement in the majority (72%) that there was a state of uncertainty regarding this clinical question (37). Each nephrologist was presented six clinical scenarios and given a choice as to whether they were likely to start warfarin, unlikely to start warfarin or were uncertain.…”
Section: Uncertainty Of Warfarin Net Benefitmentioning
confidence: 99%