2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.95.023517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Warm inflation dissipative effects: Predictions and constraints from the Planck data

Abstract: We explore the warm inflation scenario theoretical predictions looking at two different dissipative regimes for several representative primordial potentials. As it is well known, the warm inflation is able to decrease the tensor-to-scalar ratio value, rehabilitating several primordial potential ruled out in the cold inflation context by the recent cosmic microwave background data. Here we show that it is also able to produce a running of the running n s positive and within the Planck data limits. This is very … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
128
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
17
128
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the Planck-data he found β S 0.025 ± 0.013. This is in good agreement with the analysis of Benetti and Ramos [44], giving β s 0.029 ± 0.015. Inserting (4.4) and (4.13) into Equation (4.29) gives ξ in terms of observable quantities,…”
Section: Relationships Between the Spectral Indices And The Slow Rollsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the Planck-data he found β S 0.025 ± 0.013. This is in good agreement with the analysis of Benetti and Ramos [44], giving β s 0.029 ± 0.015. Inserting (4.4) and (4.13) into Equation (4.29) gives ξ in terms of observable quantities,…”
Section: Relationships Between the Spectral Indices And The Slow Rollsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In October 2016 Benetti and Ramos [44] gave α s = 0.011 ± 0.014 while Ballesteros and Casas [31] gave a smaller uncertainty, α S = − 0.018 ± 0.009, excluding values very close to zero. In January 2016 Bamba et al [45] gave, n S = 0.968 ± 0.006, r < 0.11, α S = − 0.003 ± 0.007.…”
Section: The Bicep2 Announcmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, for weak dissipation at horizon-crossing, predictions for n s and r differ significantly for the limiting cases where inflaton fluctuations are in a vacuum or in a thermal state (i.e., in equilibrium with the overall thermal bath) [17,19]. Although for strong dissipation this issue becomes less relevant, since dissipation becomes the dominant source of inflaton fluctuations, agreement with observations in most scenarios considered so far typically favours the Q * 1 regime [17,19,[48][49][50]. The dissipative dynamics itself is not sufficient to determine the state of inflaton fluctuations, since other processes in the thermal bath can be responsible for a substantial creation and annihilation of inflaton particles.…”
Section: Jhep02(2018)063supporting
confidence: 67%
“…As a matter of fact, the primordial power spectrum for WI at horizon crossing can be expressed in the form (see, e.g., Ref. [47] and references therein)…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%