2017
DOI: 10.1643/ce-16-527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Warming Strengthens the Ecological Role of Intraspecific Variation in a Predator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(76 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fish remained in each mesocosm for 3 weeks. Three‐week duration of this experiment is similar to that of other mosquitofish mesocosm experiments, which documented consistent ecological consequences of mosquitofish phenotype (Fryxell & Palkovacs, ), and was long‐enough for us to observe consistent ecological effects of mosquitofish presence and phenotype (see section 3).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Fish remained in each mesocosm for 3 weeks. Three‐week duration of this experiment is similar to that of other mosquitofish mesocosm experiments, which documented consistent ecological consequences of mosquitofish phenotype (Fryxell & Palkovacs, ), and was long‐enough for us to observe consistent ecological effects of mosquitofish presence and phenotype (see section 3).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Although it is yet unknown whether the degree of evolution here is sufficient to significantly alter ecological dynamics, it is clear that this evolution can happen over the short time scales required to potentially affect these outcomes in the nearterm future. Indeed, a young but growing literature suggests that rapid evolution and body size changes may significantly mediate the ecological consequences of warming [15,16,18,[70][71][72]. Thus, if we aim to forecast the ecological consequences of warming for populations, ecosystems and society, we may need to incorporate body size and growth evolution into these models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eco‐evolutionary feedbacks in aquatic ecosystems have been studied primarily through the perspectives of trophic interactions and nutrient recycling (Matthews, Narwani et al, ; Post & Palkovacs, ; Schoener, ). The presence of eco‐evo feedbacks in aquatic microcosms is now incontrovertible with evidence for eco‐evo effects outside of laboratory experiments for a wide variety of aquatic taxa, including zooplankton (Matthews, Hausch, Winter, Suttle, & Shurin, ; Miner, Meester, Pfrender, Lampert, & Hairston, ), aquatic macroinvertebrates (Ousterhout, Graham, Hasik, Serrano, & Siepielski, ), amphibians (Reinhardt, Steinfartz, Paetzold, & Weitere, ; Urban, ) and fishes (Auer et al, ; Carlson, Quinn, & Hendry, ; Fryxell & Palkovacs, ; Tuckett, Simon, & Kinnison, ). Here, we detail evidence for feedbacks in three fish study systems—alewife, guppies and threespine stickleback in the context of Figure .…”
Section: Evidence Of Eco‐evolutionary Feedbacks Across Terrestrial Anmentioning
confidence: 99%