Warning systems as social processes for Bangladesh cyclones

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to connect the theoretical idea of warning systems as social processes with empirical data of people’s perceptions of and actions for warning for cyclones in Bangladesh. Design/methodology/approach A case study approach is used in two villages of Khulna district in southwest Bangladesh: Kalabogi and Kamarkhola. In total, 60 households in each village were surveyed with structured questionnaires regarding how they receive their cyclone warning information as well as their experiences of warnings for Cyclone Sidr in 2007 and Cyclone Aila in 2009. Findings People in the two villages had a high rate of receiving cyclone warnings and accepted them as being credible. They also experienced high impacts from the cyclones. Yet evacuation rates to cyclone shelters were low. They did not believe that significant cyclone damage would affect them and they also highlighted the difficulty of getting to cyclone shelters due to poor roads, leading them to prefer other evacuation options which were implemented if needed. Originality/value Theoretical constructs of warning systems, such as the First Mile and late warning, are rarely examined empirically according to people’s perceptions of warnings. The case study villages have not before been researched with respect to warning systems. The findings provide empirical evidence for long-established principles of warning systems as social processes, usually involving but not relying on technical components.

Climate change adaptation responses among riparian settlements: A case study from Bangladesh

“…Also, a higher proportion of the population and various occupational groups dependent on SMF’s resources live in a marginalised pocket near the Sundarbans impact zone, close to the India-Bangladesh border. A general explanation of the riparian study sites [ 27 , 76 ] is given later in this article.…”

Climate change driven disaster risks in Bangladesh and its journey towards resilience

“…Cyclone Amphan, which made landfall on 20 May 2020, displaced 2.5 million people (WMO 2021), inundated over 400,000 hectares of land and damaged rural households but claimed few lives (26). Provision of a timely cyclone forecast, an effective early warning and successful evacuation of coastal residents are all factors behind the reduction in the death toll (Kelman et al 2018). However, cyclone shelters are not available to the over one million Rohingya refugees currently living in southeastern Bangladesh.…”

Early warning systems and evacuation: rare and extreme versus frequent and small‐scale tropical cyclones in the Philippines and Dominica

“…Early warning systems (EWS) provide information ahead of hazardous events to enable pre‐emptive action that will reduce the risks faced by exposed people. The technical components of EWS alone are insufficient, however, to trigger appropriate responses among populations beforehand, since such mechanisms are inherently social processes (Kelman et al, 2018). EWS that fail to account for human factors cannot be regarded as effective and complete (Twigg, 2003).…”