2004
DOI: 10.1353/not.2004.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Warp, Weft, and Waffle: Weaving Information Literacy into an Undergraduate Music Curriculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two additional articles, i.e. Vaughan (2004), andChristensen (2004), articulate how to approach curriculum-based music information literacy. All of these articles focus on undergraduate instruction and not graduate information needs.…”
Section: Information Seeking Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two additional articles, i.e. Vaughan (2004), andChristensen (2004), articulate how to approach curriculum-based music information literacy. All of these articles focus on undergraduate instruction and not graduate information needs.…”
Section: Information Seeking Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orr, Appleton and Wallin 9 , Grafstein 10 and Mackey and Jacobson 11 all describe the importance of working with faculty to extend IL beyond the confines of IL sessions and into the fabric of courses and programs. The need to build long-term relationships is underlined by Christensen 12 who describes the organic process of weaving IL into a discipline's curriculum as a "…slow process, often taking years if not decades to accomplish." The process as experienced at Mount Royal has proven the value of faculty-librarian partnerships; the trust, the mutual respect and the development of common values led to the success of programintegrated IL instruction.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Christensen, over the past two decades, technology has made it easier for students to find information. However, it is often more difficult for them to accommodate the amount of information they know to determine what is relevant and what is useful for their research [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%