2005
DOI: 10.1518/0018720053653811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Warrants for Prescription: Analytically and Empirically Based Approaches to Improving Decision Making

Abstract: Efforts to improve decision making must appeal to some source of warrant, i.e., specific criteria or models for guiding and evaluating decision making performance. We examine and compare the warrants for two approaches to decision aids, decision training, and consulting:analytically based prescription, which obtains warrant from formal models, and empirically based prescription, which obtains warrant from descriptive models of successful performance. We argue that empirically based warrants can provide a meani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Originating in studies of domain experts making complex, high stakes, and ill-structured decisions under time pressure, often in dangerous situations, NDM has gathered momentum over the past decade, both in organizational (Lipshitz et al, 2006) and human factors (e.g., Lipshitz and Cohen, 2005) applications. In theoretical terms, Klein's (1993) recognitionprimed decision making (RPD) model, with its emphasis on the crucial role of pattern recognition in obviating the need for extensive deliberation of multiple alternatives, epitomizes the NDM approach.…”
Section: Rethinking Bounded Rationality and The Role Of Intuitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originating in studies of domain experts making complex, high stakes, and ill-structured decisions under time pressure, often in dangerous situations, NDM has gathered momentum over the past decade, both in organizational (Lipshitz et al, 2006) and human factors (e.g., Lipshitz and Cohen, 2005) applications. In theoretical terms, Klein's (1993) recognitionprimed decision making (RPD) model, with its emphasis on the crucial role of pattern recognition in obviating the need for extensive deliberation of multiple alternatives, epitomizes the NDM approach.…”
Section: Rethinking Bounded Rationality and The Role Of Intuitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike schema theory, influence diagrams provide a formally coherent, deeply studied, widely used, fully specified calculus for reasoning under conditions of uncertainty and multiple objectives (Pearl, 1989(Pearl, , 2000Lipshitz & Cohen, 2005). Influence diagrams are both precise enough and general enough to account for reasoning in a variety of contexts.…”
Section: Motivation: Represent Inferential Relationships For Dynamic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a theoretical perspective, these strategies range along a continuum from cognitively demanding, analytical comparisons of the options available, to relatively less demanding recognition-driven responses (Lipshitz & Cohen, 2005). The selection of a particular strategy will be determined by a number of factors, including the previous experience of the decision maker, the relative costs associated with an incorrect decision, the relative uncertainty of the information available, the complexity of the environment, and the inherent skills and abilities of the decision maker (Gonzalez, 2004).…”
Section: Decision-making Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%