2022
DOI: 10.1111/disa.12505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wartime captivity and homecoming: culture, stigma, and coping strategies of formerly abducted women in post‐conflict northern Uganda

Abstract: One of the three durable solutions to mass displacement preferred by leading agencies is that survivors return to their home communities. It is believed that families and communities provide the best hope for recovery and reintegration owing to familiarity, care, and shared culture. Yet, these 'places of hope and comfort' can also be, potentially, a hostile environment in which stigma can flourish. Women who were abducted by the Lord's Resistance Army in northern Uganda find that achieving meaningful reintegra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Uganda, we found significant correlations between participants’ CES scores and particular ARM factors, notably cultural and social bonds, as well as relationships with friends and community. The broad cultural context does not encourage event centrality with respect to CRSV (see, for example, Bamidele, 2017: 77; Porter, 2017: 15), in part due to the social stigma attached to such violence (see Kiconco and Nthakomwa, 2022). Nevertheless, the positive relationship between CES scores and protective factors that enable resilience indicates that those who exhibit high event centrality are more likely to actively seek out sources of support within their social ecologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Uganda, we found significant correlations between participants’ CES scores and particular ARM factors, notably cultural and social bonds, as well as relationships with friends and community. The broad cultural context does not encourage event centrality with respect to CRSV (see, for example, Bamidele, 2017: 77; Porter, 2017: 15), in part due to the social stigma attached to such violence (see Kiconco and Nthakomwa, 2022). Nevertheless, the positive relationship between CES scores and protective factors that enable resilience indicates that those who exhibit high event centrality are more likely to actively seek out sources of support within their social ecologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%