Was ändert sich für die Rheumatologie im G-DRG-System 2006?

Liedtke-Dyong, A.; Fiori, W; Lakomek, H.‐J.; Hülsemann, J. L.; Köneke, N.; Liman, W.; Roeder, N.

doi:10.1007/s00393-006-0064-1

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sie stellt das Resultat der konstruktiven Beteiligung des Verbandes Rheumatologischer Akutkliniken e. V. (VRA) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh) an der Weiterentwicklung des G-DRG-Systems dar und bietet die Möglichkeit, die spezialisierte und sich durch besondere Struktur-und Prozessqualität auszeichnende rheumatologische Behandlung auch unter DRG-Bedingungen langfristig zu sichern [4,10,11,13,15,19]. Der Schweregrad "Äußerst schwere CC" ("complication and/or comorbidity level >3") ist somit bei diesem Kollektiv für eine Auf-bzw.…”

Section: Relevante Drgsunclassified

Was gibt es Neues für die Rheumatologie im G-DRG-System 2007?

et al. 2007

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After extensive revision the partners of the self-administration"Selbstverwaltung" reached an amicable agreement on the new version 2007 of the G-DRG system. Like in the years before, version 2007 brings about large-scale changes for its users. A better representation of inpatient services in Germany combined with an improved economic homogeneity and appropriateness can be assumed. This is based on various factors, e. g. considerably increased data-quality and the optimization of technical influences on the system. Due to the rising level of complexity it is hardly possible to maintain a clinically homogeneous classification on the basis of G-DRGs. There is need [This calls] for a new approach in strategic matters. Various initiatives succeeded in a continuous improvement how the services provided by specialised rheumatologic clinics and departments are represented in the G-DRG system. Meanwhile, even under the pressure caused by the period of convergence, quality standards were focused on as well. The systematic changes of version 2007 as well as modifications concerning co-payments, coding and accounting rules relevant for rheumatologic clinics are presented and the consequences for users are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Relevante Drgsunclassified

Was gibt es Neues für die Rheumatologie im G-DRG-System 2007?

et al. 2007

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Rheumatologie im G-DRG-Fallpauschalensystem

Fiori¹,

Lakomek²,

Roeder³

Interdisziplinäre Klinische Rheumatologie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Klinische Behandlungspfade in der akut-stationären Rheumatologie – ein strukturiertes Prozessmanagement

et al. 2007

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clinical pathways for three rheumatological indications have been successfully developed in the rheumatological departments of two hospitals. These diseases were selected because of the number of inpatients seen and/or the costs for diagnostics and therapy. Three quota-concepts, the coordination of treatment processes (quota-concept I), the sequence of implementing services (quota-concept II), and the economical utilization of available resources as well as the transparent definition of therapies (quota-concept III) have been established. These concepts have been tested individually as well as in complex situations.

show abstract

Was ändert sich für die Rheumatologie im G-DRG-System 2006?

Cited by 3 publications

References 5 publications

Was gibt es Neues für die Rheumatologie im G-DRG-System 2007?

Was gibt es Neues für die Rheumatologie im G-DRG-System 2007?

Rheumatologie im G-DRG-Fallpauschalensystem

Klinische Behandlungspfade in der akut-stationären Rheumatologie – ein strukturiertes Prozessmanagement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About