Was bringt das automatische Perimeter Octopus 2000 für die augenärztliche Praxis?

Jenny, L.; Leuenberger, A

doi:10.1055/s-2008-1054678

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Discussion1

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1986

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our hospital, at present we carry out both programs (30-1 and 30-2) routinely on all patients with glaucoma or suspected glau coma, as was also recommended by other authors [8,13,18]. We begin with the more informative program 30-2 in case testing can not be continued.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

What Is the Most Suitable Grid for Computer Perimetry in Glaucoma Patients?

Weber¹,

Dobek²

1986

Ophthalmologica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

100 eyes with suspected or proven glaucoma were examined with the Humphrey Field Analyzer 620 with 30–1 and 30–2 threshold tests, complementary 6 ° grids which combine to a 4.2° grid. The two tests were compared with each other in the resulting 68 pathological fields. 29 of them showed obvious differences in detection of scotomas. In 11 fields, the differences were so great that isolated consideration would have led to an incorrect staging of the glaucoma. Therefore, at present both tests should be applied in glaucoma cases. The frequency of different scotoma detection per test location was more than 10 times higher in the center than in the periphery. It is suggested that a program is developed with a 3 ° grid within 10° eccentricity, a 4.2° grid between 10° and 20° and a 6° grid between 20° and 30° eccentricity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only a 6° grid was used in many investi gations so far [4-7, 11,12, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20], Recently, however, there are increasing rec ommendations that both programs should be combined in order to obtain the closer 42° grid [8,13,18]. However, the precise reper cussions of this measure have not been inves tigated scientifically so far.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Is the Most Suitable Grid for Computer Perimetry in Glaucoma Patients?

Weber¹,

Dobek²

1986

Ophthalmologica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Was bringt das automatische Perimeter Octopus 2000 für die augenärztliche Praxis?

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

What Is the Most Suitable Grid for Computer Perimetry in Glaucoma Patients?

What Is the Most Suitable Grid for Computer Perimetry in Glaucoma Patients?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About