2007
DOI: 10.1007/bf03403714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Was WHO SARS-related Travel Advisory for Toronto Ethical?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The credibility of the evidence used to guide some of the response decisions to SARS was questionable. Specific examples include the use of quarantine (Holm 2009;Jacobs 2007;Tracy et al 2009) and travel advisories (Paquin 2007) both locally and globally.…”
Section: Credibility Of Evidence Informing Response Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The credibility of the evidence used to guide some of the response decisions to SARS was questionable. Specific examples include the use of quarantine (Holm 2009;Jacobs 2007;Tracy et al 2009) and travel advisories (Paquin 2007) both locally and globally.…”
Section: Credibility Of Evidence Informing Response Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, it was not quarantining that was problematic, but the lack of apparent or sufficient evidence to guide its implementation. Beyond extensive quarantining, The World Health Organization issued travel-advisories as an additional control measure to contain further national and international spread of SARS from Toronto (Paquin 2007). This travel-advisory cost Toronto $1.1 billion and restricted the international right for freedom of movement (Paquin 2007).…”
Section: Credibility Of Evidence Informing Response Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations