Washington households' expected responses to lahar threat from Mt. Rainier

Abstract

This study examines households' risk perceptions and hazard adjustments through an investigation of the population at risk of lahars from the Mt. Rainier volcano. It is guided by a model in which demographic variables, locational variables, and past information search influence three psychological variables-risk perception, hazard intrusiveness, and affective response. In turn, these psychological variables along with locational and demographic variables influence three measures of household hazard adjustments-emergency preparedness, future information search, and evacuation preparedness. The data reveal a moderate degree of support for the model, with at least partial support for seven hypotheses. White ethnicity and income predict risk perception. Past information and age predict hazard intrusiveness. Past information search and White ethnicity predict affective response. Community bondedness, past information search, and crater proximity predicted emergency preparedness and evacuation preparedness. Risk perception and hazard intrusiveness predicted future information search. In addition, the results indicate that household emergency preparedness, perceived community preparedness and perceived emergency preparedness adequacy are distinct aspects of community hazard adjustment that should be examined in future research.

Homeowner mitigation decision‐making: Exploring the theory of planned behaviour approach

“…Siegrist and Gutscher (2008) also suggest that the presence of an emotional response is not enough to persuade residents of flood-prone areas to mitigate. Similar to the results of this study, Wei and Lindell (2017) found affective response was not predictive of lahar preparedness of Mt. Rainier area residents.…”

Understanding the Relationship Between Direct Experience and Risk Perception of Natural Hazards

“…Several researchers have examined the role of worry, the emotional component, in relation to preparedness. These authors argue that incorporating this component can be particularly relevant in complex and uncertain situations, in which attachment and emotions facilitate making risk assessments more quickly, easily, and efficiently (Slovic, Finucane, Peters, & MacGregor, 2004; Terpstra, 2011; Wei & Lindell, 2017). Previous studies have found that negative emotions, such as worry and anxiety, increase levels of risk perception (Bradford et al., 2012; Ho et al., 2008; Wei & Lindell, 2017; Weinstein, Lyon, Rothman, & Cuite, 2000) but can also be distinct constructs that should be evaluated using different measures.…”

How Political Events Can Motivate Some Risk Mitigation Activities for Climate Change

“…Risk research from multiple hazards has shown that effect was an important factor in individual's perceptions of risk [36,37] and subsequent action. In Wei and Lindell [38], threat perception in the PADM was measured by expected personal consequences, hazard intrusiveness and affect. They found that the measures were significantly correlated with each other and that people who expect greater personal consequences think and talk about the hazard more frequently and have greater negative affect.…”