“…The advantages of the S-CO 2 Brayton cycle include an increase in thermal efficiency, a reduction of CO 2 emission, and a compact size of components compared with the conventional steam Rankine cycle and Brayton cycles at an operating temperature above 500 • C [1,2]. In addition, an indirect S-CO 2 cycle coupled to the sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) could eliminate the possibility of an explosive reaction between hightemperature steam and liquid sodium [4,5], thus enhancing the safety of the nuclear systems. On the other hand, for the selection of candidate structural materials in a high-temperature S-CO 2 environment, it is essential to assess the material compatibility because excessive corrosion, oxide spallation, and internal carburization might deteriorate the heat transfer capability and long-term integrity of components, such as the compact-type intermediate heat exchanger (IHX).…”