2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waste ceramic powder-based geopolymer mortars: Effect of curing temperature and alkaline solution-to-binder ratio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For reference specimens, that is, without the addition of the glass waste, the increase in the molar ratio causes a significant increase in the apparent specific mass, since the mixture should have a higher concentration of precursors, which are the granulated materials of mixture used. When adding the waste, it is observed that in smaller ratios, such as 2.5 and 3, there was an increase in the apparent specific mass, which may have been caused by the low reactive activity of the waste within the matrix, which ended up contributing only in pore filling 38 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reference specimens, that is, without the addition of the glass waste, the increase in the molar ratio causes a significant increase in the apparent specific mass, since the mixture should have a higher concentration of precursors, which are the granulated materials of mixture used. When adding the waste, it is observed that in smaller ratios, such as 2.5 and 3, there was an increase in the apparent specific mass, which may have been caused by the low reactive activity of the waste within the matrix, which ended up contributing only in pore filling 38 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 compares the FS values measured from RNa, RK, and RNaS samples with natural aging with different geopolymers found in the literature. The following materials were collected from the literature: commercial metakaolin (GM) activated with sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide solution [35], ceramic residue (GPM 0.6)-activated alkaline activated with sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide solution [46], chamotte residues molded and pressed (CM and CP, respectively) alkali activated with potassium hydroxide/sodium silicate solution [31], Metakaolin HP Ultra molded and pressed (MM and MP, respectively) alkali activated with hydroxide/sodium silicate solution [31], fly ash with a proportion of 15% granulated blast furnace slag (AA3) alkali activated with sodium silicate solution [47], blast furnace slag and fly ash (50FA1.00) alkali active with Na 2 SiO 3 /NaOH solution [48], geopolymeric concrete prepared using a Class F fly ash (A40 S00), and alkali activated with 114.3 kg/m 3 Na 2 SiO 3 and 45.7 kg/m 3 NaOH solution and 100 kg/m 3 of Na 2 SiO 3 and 40 NaOH kg/m 3 solution (A35 S00) [49], fly ash-based mixtures (AF-AS) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) alkali activated with sodium hydroxide/sodium silicate solution [50], low-calcium fly ash (GPC) alkali activated with (103 kg/m 3 ) sodium hydroxide/(41 kg/m 3 ) sodium silicate solution [51].…”
Section: Durability Of Activated Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They pointed out that the compressive strength of geopolymers at high temperatures was affected by the concentration and content of NaOH, KOH, and Na 2 SiO 3 , and that these exhibited a good thermal stability even when heated up to 1000 °C. Shoei et al [ 22 ] showed that WCP can be used as a raw material for NaOH- and Na 2 SiO 3 -activated geopolymer mortar. They confirmed that the density and compressive strength were affected by the ratio of the alkaline solution to the binder and the curing temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%