Waste, marginal property practices and the circular economy

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine the effect of circular economy’s ending of waste on marginal property practices. Design/methodology/approach This paper utilises doctrinal and theoretical legal analysis, along with theoretical perspectives and qualitative empirical evidence drawn from non-legal academic disciplines. Findings The current legalistic conception of waste depends on control and value. The indeterminate status of waste as goods at the margins of consumption attracts attention from legal regimes. This process is evidenced by a commercialised treatment of goods at the margins of consumption, limiting the scope of radical marginal property practices such as freeganism (taking goods abandoned by others, to use such goods). Social implications The circular economy aims to end waste. Restriction, and ultimately elimination, of marginal property practices is necessary for circular economy. Freegans will be limited to acting in a “challenge” role, identifying breaches of commercial commodification processes. Control over the use (including disposal) of goods reduces the spaces available for marginal property practices, which in turn raises problematic normative implications for “normal” consumption practices involving waste. Originality/value This is the first examination of the impact of circular economy on freeganism. It is also the first sustained application of marginal property theory (van der Walt, 2009) in a legal analysis of circular economy and waste.

An Investigation of Waste Management Practice in a South African Township: A Case Study of Ekuphumleni Township, Ndlambe Municipality

“…Waste Directive defines waste as any object or substance the owner throws away, implying that it is useless [19]. However, several schools of thought, such as Steenmans and Malcolm [20], Thomas [21], and Hannon and Zaman [22], have argued against this definition as the value of waste is deemed to be subjective as what is waste to a consumer is a resource to another.…”