2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waste type, incineration, and aeration are associated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl levels in landfill leachates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mixture may be from one or more point sources releasing multiple PFAS and/or PFAS by‐products into the air and water, such as a Chemours plant in North Carolina, and suggest that exposures may be substantial (McCord and Strynar 2019). However, numerous other PFAS sources are known to impact community exposure to PFAS mixtures, such as landfill leachate, biosolids recycling, and aqueous film–forming foam contamination of drinking water sources, among others (Sunderland et al 2019; Solo‐Gabriele et al 2020). Aqueous film–forming foam and other mixtures evident in drinking water, food packaging, health and beauty products, and food‐based sources are often poorly characterized (Sunderland et al 2019; Susmann et al 2019).…”
Section: So Many Pfas So Little Time: Accelerating the Pace Of Discomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mixture may be from one or more point sources releasing multiple PFAS and/or PFAS by‐products into the air and water, such as a Chemours plant in North Carolina, and suggest that exposures may be substantial (McCord and Strynar 2019). However, numerous other PFAS sources are known to impact community exposure to PFAS mixtures, such as landfill leachate, biosolids recycling, and aqueous film–forming foam contamination of drinking water sources, among others (Sunderland et al 2019; Solo‐Gabriele et al 2020). Aqueous film–forming foam and other mixtures evident in drinking water, food packaging, health and beauty products, and food‐based sources are often poorly characterized (Sunderland et al 2019; Susmann et al 2019).…”
Section: So Many Pfas So Little Time: Accelerating the Pace Of Discomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sludge, however, is eventually removed from the WWTP and is often used as organic soil amendment which has been shown to contribute to the contamination of soil and agricultural crops [52]. Sewage sludge, AFFFs, textiles, and other PFAS-containing products are also routinely disposed of at incineration facilities [53][54][55][56]. It is unclear whether PFAS are released to the atmosphere in their original state during incineration; however, the release of lower-molecular-mass PFAS products has been reported [56].…”
Section: Direct Sources Of Legacy Pfasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ash produced from the incineration of sewage sludge and other PFAS-containing waste products is also routinely discarded in landfills. Depending on the temperature of incineration, PFAS and products of incomplete combustion can still be present in ash upon disposal [55]. Another major source of PFAS to landfills is the disposal of used consumer goods such as food packing materials, paper products, textiles, and carpets [64][65][66].…”
Section: Landfills As Direct and Indirect Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further 32.7 MT (for 2016-2017) of non-core wastes (e.g., agricultural organics, fly ash from coal power plants, red muds from aluminium processing) are landfilled in Australia [29]. While C&D wastes, and some industrial ash wastes pose continued risk for PFAS contamination and transfer to landfill [37], most mine wastes pose minimal risk.…”
Section: Overview Of Pfas In Wastesmentioning
confidence: 99%