2016
DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mew021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waste Workers’ Exposure to Airborne Fungal and Bacterial Species in the Truck Cab and During Waste Collection

Abstract: A large number of people work with garbage collection, and exposure to microorganisms is considered an occupational health problem. However, knowledge on microbial exposure at species level is limited. The aim of the study was to achieve knowledge on waste collectors’ exposure to airborne inhalable fungal and bacterial species during waste collection with focus on the transport of airborne microorganisms into the truck cab. Airborne microorganisms were collected with samplers mounted in the truck cab, on the w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
4
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some studies focusing on hospital and dental waste, although very few discuss specific aspects such as their potential biological risks, specially their fungi content. Previous results of our group (Vieira et al., , ) and other studies (Madsen, Alwan, Ørberg, Uhrbrand, & Jørgensen, ) proved the presence of different species of viable bacteria and also of some yeast inside biomedical waste. To widen the discussion on the possible risks to waste workers, this study proposed to investigate fungal strains recovered from dental waste, comparing with those samples isolated from waste workers' tissues (hands and nasal mucosa) and their work wear.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…There are some studies focusing on hospital and dental waste, although very few discuss specific aspects such as their potential biological risks, specially their fungi content. Previous results of our group (Vieira et al., , ) and other studies (Madsen, Alwan, Ørberg, Uhrbrand, & Jørgensen, ) proved the presence of different species of viable bacteria and also of some yeast inside biomedical waste. To widen the discussion on the possible risks to waste workers, this study proposed to investigate fungal strains recovered from dental waste, comparing with those samples isolated from waste workers' tissues (hands and nasal mucosa) and their work wear.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Isolates resembling MRSA and S. aureus were identified from MRSA-agar and SA-agar, respectively using matrixassisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Madsen et al 2016). A toothpick was used to transfer a small amount of the bacterial colony onto the target plate (MSP 96 target polished steel BC; Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany).…”
Section: Species Identification By Maldi-tof Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if a few studies carried out a large identification approach for microorganisms with molecular biology (quantitative PCR) (Le Goff et al, 2010;Pankhurst L.J. et al, 2012) or mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) (Madsen et al, 2016;Nasir et al, 2018a), or investigated specific antigens with enzyme immunoassays (van Kampen et al 2014), data in most studies do not reflect the variety of different species. New biomolecular technologies such as next-generation DNA sequencing can help in informing on the microbial diversity and the relative abundance of airborne microorganisms and in identifying indicators for monitoring bioaerosols emission (Duquenne et al, 2018).…”
Section: Hazard Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest levels of exposure to airborne bacteria and fungi have been reported at composting sites and mechanical biological treatment (MBT) facilities (Pearson et al, 2015;Persoons et al, 2010;Schlosser et al, 2009;Searl, 2008;Sykes et al, 2011;Tolvanen and Hänninen, 2005;Wouters et al, 2006) , followed by material recovery facilities (MRFs) and during waste collection operation (Cerna et al, 2017;Gladding and Coggins, 1997;Lavoie et al, 2002;Madsen et al, 2016;Neumann et al, 2002;Nielsen et al, 1995;Schlosser et al, 2015;Würtz and Breum, 1997) (Figure 1). These exposure levels were 100 to 100,000 times higher than highest outdoor background levels.…”
Section: What Do We Know About Waste Workers' Exposure To Bioaerosols?mentioning
confidence: 99%