2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wastewater treatment using membrane filtration—effect of biosolids concentration on cake resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
64
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
64
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower range is insufficiently captured by the data, however for higher ranges there is a clear improvement of filterability with increasing MLSS concentrations. Nevertheless, Chang and Kim (2005) measured an increased cake resistance with an MLSS concentration shift from 0.09 to 3.7 g/L, Fang and Shi (2005) an increase in total resistance with a shift from 2.4 to 9.6 g/L and Psoch and Schiewer (2006) an increased fouling potential with a shift from 3 to 10 g/L in MLSS concentration. Therefore, it seems logical to assume that good sludge filterability might also be possible in sludge with low MLSS concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The lower range is insufficiently captured by the data, however for higher ranges there is a clear improvement of filterability with increasing MLSS concentrations. Nevertheless, Chang and Kim (2005) measured an increased cake resistance with an MLSS concentration shift from 0.09 to 3.7 g/L, Fang and Shi (2005) an increase in total resistance with a shift from 2.4 to 9.6 g/L and Psoch and Schiewer (2006) an increased fouling potential with a shift from 3 to 10 g/L in MLSS concentration. Therefore, it seems logical to assume that good sludge filterability might also be possible in sludge with low MLSS concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the submerged hollow fiber MBR, the membranes are directly immersed in the aeration tank. The results of bench-scale experiments, as well as many industrial and municipal operations, demonstrate high treatment efficiencies for chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), and turbidity [19,42,63,67,68]. Although the MBR technology has been applied in many full-scale plants worldwide for treating municipal and industrial wastewater, membrane fouling and correspondingly increased energy consumption remain chief obstacles, as highlighted in a recent review [28].…”
Section: Membrane Bioreactors (Mbrs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to an increase in MLSS concentration, at lower HRTs, membrane fouled more quickly as compared to that in higher HRTs because membrane exposed with more concentrated culture and higher non-Newtonian viscosity at lower HRT, which caused the membrane fouling faster (Table 5). Chang and Kim (2005) observed that the increase in MLSS concentration seems to have a mostly negative impact (higher TMP or lower flux) on the MBR hydraulic performance.…”
Section: Effect Of Hrt On Biomass Concentration and Tmpmentioning
confidence: 92%