1968
DOI: 10.1080/01496396808053464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Adduct Formation in Extracted Chelates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since TPB - has no ability to transport water as shown above, the value of 0.3 should be allotted to [Fe(phen) 3 ] 2+ . This may be supported by the previous observation, in which [Fe(phen) 3 ] 2+ formed an adduct with as much as 6 water molecules when it was extracted to nitromethane. However, this view was later criticized by Yamamoto et al, who concluded that water was transported exclusively by the anion (e.g.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since TPB - has no ability to transport water as shown above, the value of 0.3 should be allotted to [Fe(phen) 3 ] 2+ . This may be supported by the previous observation, in which [Fe(phen) 3 ] 2+ formed an adduct with as much as 6 water molecules when it was extracted to nitromethane. However, this view was later criticized by Yamamoto et al, who concluded that water was transported exclusively by the anion (e.g.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, this view was later criticized by Yamamoto et al, who concluded that water was transported exclusively by the anion (e.g. ClO 4 - in ref ) and the chelate cation took no part in the transference. On the whole, Yamamoto et al's conclusion is in line with the present result, but the contribution from the chelate cation should not be excluded completely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%