2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water and (bio)chemical cycling in gravel pit lakes: A review and outlook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
(315 reference statements)
3
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no significant difference in mean pH between the two lakes. The values reported here confirm that the pH of gravel pit lakes studied so far is higher than that of typical natural lakes [6]. A likely explanation is the leaching of calcium rich sediments by groundwater upstream from the lakes [6].…”
Section: Phsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There is no significant difference in mean pH between the two lakes. The values reported here confirm that the pH of gravel pit lakes studied so far is higher than that of typical natural lakes [6]. A likely explanation is the leaching of calcium rich sediments by groundwater upstream from the lakes [6].…”
Section: Phsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The values reported here confirm that the pH of gravel pit lakes studied so far is higher than that of typical natural lakes [6]. A likely explanation is the leaching of calcium rich sediments by groundwater upstream from the lakes [6]. The number of outliers (extreme values with residuals outside of (−1.96, 1.96)) was highest (8) for BP Lake and reflects the large seasonal fluctuations.…”
Section: Phsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations