1981
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-8306-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water and Microbial Stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
83
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for this different response could be related to the low P availability in the P-poor C. vulgaris litter. At low soil water content, diffusion of soluble substrates is reduced (Griffin 1981a) and/or microbial mobility and consequent access to substrate declines (Griffin 1981b;Killham et al 1993). This could affect the mineralization and immobilization of the limiting nutrient (P) more strongly than the availability of the more abundant nutrients (C and N).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for this different response could be related to the low P availability in the P-poor C. vulgaris litter. At low soil water content, diffusion of soluble substrates is reduced (Griffin 1981a) and/or microbial mobility and consequent access to substrate declines (Griffin 1981b;Killham et al 1993). This could affect the mineralization and immobilization of the limiting nutrient (P) more strongly than the availability of the more abundant nutrients (C and N).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of the major solutes have been estimated using the measured water content with corrections for non-solvent water in the walls as determined by electron microscopy (Luard, 1980) and 25 % of the cytoplasmic water also being unavailable as a solvent (Cooke & Kuntz, 1974;Griffin, 1981). At an external potential of -2 MPa, when the osmoticum was sucrose, there was an overestimation of about 0-7 MPa in the calculated value relative to the observed potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R m is sensitive to variation in soil water status as water content strongly influences microbial physiological processes (Liu et al 2002, Xu et al 2004. When soil water content decreases, the metabolic activity of most microbial species also decreases, resulting in decreased R m and nutrient mineralization (Griffin 1981, Schimel et al 2007). Reportedly, the effect of water content on R m differed among litter types both in laboratory experiments (Manzoni et al 2012) and in the field (Jomura et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%