2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water as a Conformational Editor in Protein Folding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using constraints derived from NMR, we modeled the structure of the complex between PrP and Fe(III)-TMPyP. The initial model, produced using the NMR intensity data displayed on the PrP backbone, was refined using in-house docking software (BUDE) (37)(38)(39).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using constraints derived from NMR, we modeled the structure of the complex between PrP and Fe(III)-TMPyP. The initial model, produced using the NMR intensity data displayed on the PrP backbone, was refined using in-house docking software (BUDE) (37)(38)(39).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NMR structure (1QLX) of residues 23-230 of the human prion protein was used for modeling the interaction between PrP c and Fe(III)-TMPyP. The initial model was refined using in-house docking software (37)(38)(39).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the solvation/desolvation barriers in protein folding is most obvious when comparing simulations with and without the explicit inclusion of the barriers in the potential energy function. Incorporation of solvation/desolvation barriers in folding simulations based on a semi-realistic off-lattice protein model for several peptides with well defined native states, results in an increase of the average energy for the non-native states, increased stability of the native state and an increase in folding cooperativity, relative to the same simulations in the absence of the desolvation barriers [65]. In all cases, the folding rate is increased when the desolvation barriers are included.…”
Section: Water Affects the Energy Landscapementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Within the context of a protein, the nature of these local transition barriers can vary depending on the groups near the interacting atoms in such a way to favor some conformations over others (see Figure 4 for a comparison of the solvation/desolvation barriers for two approaching methane molecules versus alanine molecules). In this manner, solvation/desolvation barriers collectively can have a profound effect on the rate-limiting step in protein folding [64], affecting the energy landscape as to minimize frustration [65]. The effect of the solvation/desolvation barriers in protein folding is most obvious when comparing simulations with and without the explicit inclusion of the barriers in the potential energy function.…”
Section: Water Affects the Energy Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,32 We have been developing a coarse-grained model for simulating polypeptides called RAFT (reduced Ramachandran angle and folding force field for tertiary structure prediction). [33][34][35][36] RAFT uses idealized covalent bonds, discrete backbone torsion angles, fixed side chains, and unified atoms; and employs a semiempirical physicochemical force field (implicit solvent) involving pairwise potentials of mean force describing steric, hydrophobic, H-bonding, and ionion interactions derived from experimental data. Discrete models like RAFT lend themselves well to Monte Carlo (MC) sampling methods for estimating Boltzmann averaged properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%