1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1992.tb00897.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water availability in a restored soil

Abstract: Abstract. The water contents of a restored and an undisturbed soil were monitored over two ‘dry’ growing seasons in order to examine the differences in crop water availability from different horizons. Bulk density was approximately 10% greater in the topsoil of restored land than in undisturbed land, and the water holding capacity was less, probably because there was less organic matter. In the subsoil a major problem was the inability of the soil to allow winter rainfall to recharge the water reserves. Bulk … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Tillage damages any soil with low structural stability and vitality, so it is also best kept to a minimum. Subsoiling of compacted layers prior to forestation may .facilitate root establishment (Davies et al 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tillage damages any soil with low structural stability and vitality, so it is also best kept to a minimum. Subsoiling of compacted layers prior to forestation may .facilitate root establishment (Davies et al 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The layer of soil cover, typically mixed with foliage and litter, together with clay and mineral particles maintain the soil's water storage capacity-vital for plant growth [9]. Removal of topsoil as part of typical mining practices severely depletes soil nutrients such as nitrogen, carbon, phosphorus and sulfur [10]. Soil organic matter (SOM) provides energy for micro-organisms that unlock nutrient sources for all living organisms in the rhizosphere [11].…”
Section: Applied Environmental Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A full description of soil profiles at each site has been given elsewhere (Davies et al, 1992). Both sites consisted of 25-30cm of topsoil overlying subsoil, 70-80cm deep at the control site and 90cm deep at the restored site.…”
Section: Site Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil moisture content at both sites was measured at four depths (10cm, 20cm, 40cm and 70cm) on a 14-day cycle using duplicated access tubes and a neutron probe. Moisture content was converted to soil matric potential using an equation derived fronj moisture release curves (Davies et al, 1992). The field capacity of these soils was taken as -5kPa for the topsoil and -lOkPa for the subsoil, and the permanent wilting point as -1500kPa (Milthorpe and Moorby.…”
Section: Environmental Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%