2015
DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2014037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water chemistry and endangered white-clawed Crayfish: a literature review and field study of water chemistry association inAustropotamobius pallipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trouilhe et al, 2007;Favaro et al, 2010). Crayfish have a strong dependence on calcium for maintenance of the exoskeleton (Greenaway, 1985) and generally do not persist in locations where calcium concentration is below 5 mg L À1 (Jay and Holdich, 1981;Haddaway et al, 2015). Although 6 of the studies did not identify a relationship with water chemistry parameters, this likely reflects the lack of variation in such parameters over the scales studied, i.e., within catchment, rather than importance more generally.…”
Section: Water Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Trouilhe et al, 2007;Favaro et al, 2010). Crayfish have a strong dependence on calcium for maintenance of the exoskeleton (Greenaway, 1985) and generally do not persist in locations where calcium concentration is below 5 mg L À1 (Jay and Holdich, 1981;Haddaway et al, 2015). Although 6 of the studies did not identify a relationship with water chemistry parameters, this likely reflects the lack of variation in such parameters over the scales studied, i.e., within catchment, rather than importance more generally.…”
Section: Water Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The selection criteria were designed to retain only those articles that were relevant to the aims of this review, i.e., that quantitatively assessed the relationship between crayfish occurrence/density and habitat variables. Studies that focussed solely on water chemistry parameters were excluded because these have been reviewed quantitatively elsewhere (Trouilhe et al, 2007;Haddaway et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[7][8][9], but since these reviews lack formally peer-reviewed and published protocols, these works lack the traceability of systematic reviews. Systematic review methods, therefore, offer a high degree of transparency and verifiability where an update is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%